English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Since most christians regard christianity as a faith based on the concept of LOVE , and since most Christians loath descrimination and religious intolerence and respect human rights and feel regret for the horrendous actions of the colonial powers of the past. Then it would be hard to wage a crusade against muslim nation without waging an emotional/religious campaign to change the public opinion of chirstians . Isn't it a campign of hate similar to the campaigns launched by the Nazis against the Jews? Isn't the only purpose of such attempts is to provoke the muslims as much as possible, then record their reactions and display it in the media in a way that depicts them as animals worthy of being slain by christian forces in countries like Iraq, iran, etc?

2006-09-15 21:09:54 · 12 answers · asked by lagondapaolini 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

12 answers

No, the recent Papal comments about islam are intended to facilitate resistance to muslim colonization of Western nations.

Since most muslims regard islam as a faith based on the concept of JIHAD, and since most muslims loathe justice and religious tolerance and disrespect Human Rights and feel pride in the horrendous actions of the muslim-supremacist aggressors of the past. Then it would be easy to wage jihad against Western or Hindu Civilization with no need to change public opinion of muslims. Isn't a campaign of hate similar to the campaigns launched by the Turks against the Armenians? Isn't the only purpose of such attempts to provoke civilized people as much as possible, then record their reactions and display it in the media in a way that depicts them as animals worthy of being slain by muslim forces in countries like Serbia, Ossetia, Darfur, Egypt, Israel, Iraq, India, Thailand, Indonesia, etc?

2006-09-16 19:27:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

1) Nobody wants to colonize those crappy desert waste lands. Listen to the conspiracy theorists all you want, that oil is just not as valuable as all that. No really, it's not that valuable. The West has many more lucrative forms of revenue we could start wars over.
2)There is no campaign of hate. Even if there were, hate isn't all that bad. You HATE the current president, for instance, but you don't know any more about him or the specifics of his policies than you do about so-called campaign of hate. "Campaign of Hate" sounds like a 20/20 expose, BTW, clever girl.
3) A college logic class will inform you that comparing some supposed propaganda to the treachery of the Third Reich is in fact a logical fallacy.
4) Nobody is forcing those people to behave like animals on TV. There are much worse images of them than the media will show on the 6 o'clock news.

2006-09-16 04:20:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

this letter was written in the 19th century by a very powerful occultist/satanist who wrote the 'bible' of the freemasonists. These evil blood suckers planned it all. Here it goes:

Following are apparently extracts of the letter, showing how Three World Wars have been planned for many generations.

"The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the "agentur" (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions." 2

Students of history will recognize that the political alliances of England on one side and Germany on the other, forged between 1871 and 1898 by Otto von Bismarck, co-conspirator of Albert Pike, were instrumental in bringing about the First World War.

"The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm." 3

After this Second World War, Communism was made strong enough to begin taking over weaker governments. In 1945, at the Potsdam Conference between Truman, Churchill, and Stalin, a large portion of Europe was simply handed over to Russia, and on the other side of the world, the aftermath of the war with Japan helped to sweep the tide of Communism into China.

(Readers who argue that the terms Nazism and Zionism were not known in 1871 should remember that the Illuminati invented both these movements. In addition, Communism as an ideology, and as a coined phrase, originates in France during the Revolution. In 1785, Restif coined the phrase four years before revolution broke out. Restif and Babeuf, in turn, were influenced by Rousseau - as was the most famous conspirator of them all, Adam Weishaupt.)

"The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time." 4

2006-09-16 04:15:18 · answer #3 · answered by raze 2 · 0 0

I think in these instances we have to look at the big picture, which is that no god would need to be worshiped. How sad is it to be a being to create a race just to worship you. No god I could ever imagine would need that. If you look at the big picture, humanity creates a deity to fill in the gaps of our being that are missing... now lets move on... Grow up people!

2006-09-16 04:15:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Don't let the Christians get to you. They're all crazy and their religion has oppressed people just as much as Islam or any other faith. Think of the Spanish Inquisition or the "witch" trials...

2006-09-16 04:12:46 · answer #5 · answered by trash1ey 4 · 2 1

You got a point there, Lag. A neonazi Bush-Pope conspiracy! Sounds plausible. Not surprised by anything anymore.

The start of WW 3??? Way to go Ratz!

2006-09-16 04:17:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The pope's statement was really, really stupid and he should make an apologize. john paul II would never have dreamed of saying these things!
Anyone with some brains would agree it's not correct to attack any religion in this manner.

2006-09-16 04:14:12 · answer #7 · answered by neshama 5 · 0 2

I think the Pope thinks his religion is the only one and the only correct one. That is the reason behind his comments.

2006-09-16 04:12:49 · answer #8 · answered by San Diego Art Nut 6 · 0 0

You are ALL whacked...Jews, Christians, Muslims. If you kill each other off, the world will be more peaceful.

2006-09-16 04:33:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Do not deceive yourself, no one is trying to colonize the Muslim world, we are only trying to civilize it.

By doing so it would make the world safe/ safer.

2006-09-16 04:12:40 · answer #10 · answered by Adyghe Ha'Yapheh-Phiyah 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers