Before the faithful flock get their knickers in a twist and blow a gasket answering this question consider the following. Jesus was a man (hypothetically he may have been a god or demigod too) but christians executed many people as heretics for claiming he was not a man.Therfore Christians accept Jesus as a man. A man is a living organism and all living organisms are by definition either animals, plants, fungi or bacteria. Unless you want to argue that the hominid Jesus was a fungus, bacterium or plant you would have to agree he was an animal. All living beings have mutations (variations) in their genes hence they are by definition mutants. It is through these mutations that DNA identifications in Criminology etc are made. Therfore the Jesus man was a mutant animal (and so are you!) agreed? No Bible quotes please but you can insult or threaten me as I find it amusing :)
2006-09-15 20:23:40 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I see you have seen the new X-men movie too.
2006-09-15 20:26:38 · answer #1 · answered by ihatestupidclowns 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
yes he was a mutant animal, all organisms are mutants this is called genetic diversity and as a homonoid ape jesus was an animal. He never claimed to be divine. great question
2006-09-16 15:43:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Alas my brother he was just a human being.And yes human beings are mammals which in fact would make them animals.As for mutant...hardly.Just a normal man with a different way of doing things then what was the accepted norms at the time so he was killed.Then the religion that followed was persecuted then eventually enslaved and persecuted millions themselves.Killing in the name of God...Sound familiar???Many Indians died for that..their story never told.Check your history...
2006-09-15 20:32:16 · answer #3 · answered by drokk 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i will very rather settle for that darwin would have been incorrect, had I been born in 1840 i ought to in all risk have faith much greater... yet darwin, wallace, gould, miller, yet another miller, watson, crick, mendel, dobazanski, and infinite hundreds of different scientists all simultaeneously being incorrect related to the wonderful comparable subject count? That i hit upon confusing to swallow... You your self mentioned that faith and technological know-how can bypass hand in hand, why can not this be one occasion? "once you're a supporter of evolution, are you a minimum of keen to discover the possibility that it ought to not easily be genuine?" confident, ask all people who knows the scientific technique and what it is that technological know-how is desperate out to do and you gets a solid unanimous "confident!" if einstien did not entertain the possibility that newton grow to be incorrect he would have in no way arise with relativity "Has evolution, in this specific area, been shown yet, or it relies upon empirical data and conjecture" close... that is in keeping with empirical data and logical inference. conjecture is purely as solid as hypothesis... and hypothesis/conjecture on my own would not make for solid technological know-how "till the reasoning at the back of that denial is built on a solid, cogent, coherent philosophical commencing place." close lower back... you would be wanting a solid, cogent (wonderful use of logical terminology BTW) and coherent scientific commencing place, via fact: A) we are speaking approximately technological know-how... in case you have been speaking approximately proving god or some thing then confident, this stands out as the case and B) technological know-how is inductive, philosophy is by and massive deductive. and no deductive argument may well be solid/cogent (purely valid/sound)
2016-12-18 11:10:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mankind was created in the image of GOD.... in the beginning before sin man looked like GOD and lived a perfect GODLY life...
If you want to believe that your great great grand dad was a chimp that's your right... as for me, my ETERNAL FATHER is the creator of the universe, almighty GOD, the great I AM, the ALL KNOWING, ALL POWERFUL, OMNIPRESENT LORD OF ALL CREATION, GLORY BE TO GOD FOR NOW AND EVER MORE AMEN.... ~GOD BLESS YOU AND HAVE A NICE DAY~
2006-09-15 20:46:02 · answer #5 · answered by wordman 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He wasn't a mutant animal. Like all of us he was a human being.
2006-09-15 20:29:09 · answer #6 · answered by Kali_girl825 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
im not sure the science of this but it sounds about right. i now respect jesus now even more knowing that he was not only one of the coolest people that god ever created but was also a mutant animal.
2006-09-15 20:29:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
the truth is..... jesus was a human being like us.... a messenger.. sent by God, ALLAH to tell people the truth.... a caliph... there's nothing 2 fact bout the jesus as the god or demigod... Jesus was not god... please do check the right sources of the Real fact bout Jesus... find it in Holy Quran as well...
2006-09-15 20:46:22 · answer #8 · answered by uci 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
"There is a way that seems right to a man,
but in the end it leads to death.>Proverbs 14:12
How sure are you of your philosophy of life?
are you willing to wager everything,even your soul?
2006-09-15 20:59:18 · answer #9 · answered by Mr Toooo Sexy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are expending entirely too much mental energy with this theory of deciding who is or isn't a mushroom!!! You don't have to be religious. Chill out, doctor, chill out.
2006-09-15 20:31:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
your trying to be avencive I find you name and picture ofencive when you obviusly despise Jesus yes he was a man and as such was a animal while on earth but your question aims to insult you are ignorant but God still loves you
2006-09-15 20:28:53 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋