English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Yes, I know it's sad but she should get over it, don't you think?
He was already an adult, anyway.
She has a new kid now!!! She should concentrate on her new kid. I mean her baby has replaced her son so she really should stop being sad seeing as she has a new child now. It's not that bad, it's not as if she doesn't have children. She has to keep strong for her daughter. I mean i would understand why it would be tragic if he were her only child but now she has another child so it's not so bad.

2006-09-15 19:18:47 · 34 answers · asked by Karina 1 in Pregnancy & Parenting Other - Pregnancy & Parenting

i'm not saying it's not sad, i'm just saying that she has a baby now. the baby is much more important. she should get over her son and they should stop talking about how sad she is on the news.

2006-09-15 19:25:18 · update #1

yes, children do replace other children... i can prove it. my best friend's older sister died at 6 yrs old from leukemiajust a few months after my friend was born. her parents still look back and feel bad but they got over it... these words came out of their mouths : "the only reason we stayed strong is because we had laura (my friend) to help us put the tragedy behind us and to keep us looking forward for a bright future."
see? a new baby DID help alot, she replaced her sister.

2006-09-15 19:58:05 · update #2

34 answers

Because he was her SON. You can't just replace humans like trash bags and batteries. She loved him (obviously) and she can't just "get over" his death. This question has led me to believe that you've never really loved anyone at all.

2006-09-15 19:20:06 · answer #1 · answered by nerveserver 5 · 5 0

Lol! Are you serious? I think you're very naive or youre just an ***! That was her first born child! It doesnt matter how many children you have they are your children and I hope that if that happened to you that you would love your child enough to be devestated. Its a natural reaction and if you werent devestated something is terribly wrong with you. Anna had a bond with her son. She had him when she was 17 or 18. They were there for eachother like best friends esp. him he was their for her through everything. From everything I read he was a wonderful person esp. to his mother. A great son. She will never be the same after this. And no other child will be able to replace him. She will love her daughter I am sure. But the bond her and daniel had will be very tough to match. They grew up together and he was her only kid for 20 years. He was still her baby. You dont start loving your child less just because they are an adult. I think you are stupid or just trying to get reactions from people. I hope its the second one lol!

2006-09-16 02:28:10 · answer #2 · answered by jenn87 2 · 1 0

How could you say something like that?

I have two daughters. One is 15, one is 8 months old.
If anything ever happened to my older daughter, GOD FORBID, i would be devastated. I would not know what to do and NO, it does not help that I have an 8 month old. I love both of them to death, and i love both of them equally. My 8 month old would NEVER replace my 15 year old.
Even if I had 10 children and one were to die, I would NEVER forget. I would grieve for the rest of my life. Yes, it's true that having more children does keep you strong because you have to stay strong for your other children...you have to continue to love, care for, and support your other children which may help a tiny bit with moving on but you will NEVER EVER forget, and that one child will NEVER be replaced.
It doesn't matter how old the child is.
When my daughters will be 50, they will still be my babies.

My god, sorry to say but you are sick. Daniel Smith was an innocent boy who's young life was sadly taken away. Anna nicole smith has every right to be sad. She should be. That was her baby..... i can't even imagine the pain she is going through.

And no, Anna Nicole's baby daughter is not more important than Daniel. They are both equally important.

Poor Anna, Poor Daniel.

God bless his soul and his family.

2006-09-15 20:05:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think you misunderstood your friend parents, a child is not replaceable, they mean that the baby give strengh to help give them a reason to get up everyday, they meant that if it was not for the baby the will get into deep depression etc etc
Anna Nicole new baby will never bring peace to her like your friend parent had instead it will agony because every time she remember the birth she also will remember the death of her child
and also she did not have time to say goodbye her son was taken from her suddenly their is no closure
I understand that your are innocently asking that?
also remember for your friend parents it was a blessing that the child died not because they did not love him but because he was suffering and that was painful for them , they had time to say good bye
Everyone handle grief differently those people reasoning their grief and survive
I am not sure if Anna will be able to reasoning her grief to survive
because her son was not sick or dying

2006-09-15 23:37:01 · answer #4 · answered by waiting for baby 6 · 0 0

I don't mean to be rude but are you a parent? A new baby does not replace the one that died. Some people who lose a child never get over it in their whole life. This young man died a few days ago and she loved him with all her heart. Are you heartless? This was her beloved son. Do you love anyone? How would you feel if they died. Could you replace them?

2006-09-15 19:30:29 · answer #5 · answered by winkcat 7 · 2 0

Children are not replaceable like a car that got wrecked! What a stupid & cruel thing to say.
You obviously have never had kids. I hope you are a minor because I would really be upset to hear this kind of crap coming from an adult.

2006-09-15 19:22:21 · answer #6 · answered by Chloe 6 · 2 0

Sudden and unexpected death is always harder then when one is prepared for a loved one's death. To out live your own child (no matter how old they are) is probably the worst thing that could ever happen to a human. Anna Nicole Smith is human, she must mourn for self preservation and her baby daughter's future.

2006-09-16 19:59:49 · answer #7 · answered by lynnguys 6 · 0 0

You've obviously never lost a child. That baby remains your baby for life, regardless of their age. People don't replace other people, that's the beauty of life. Grow up and ask a question when you're able to handle the answer.

2006-09-15 21:46:32 · answer #8 · answered by traydenma 2 · 0 0

So true and every parent should totally forget about their first born child when the 2nd arrives and so on...PSSHhh they are human right they don't need guidance or love or anything grow up already I mean c'mon. I'm pretty sure you asked this question to be a duche bag so have a great time burning in hell.

2006-09-15 19:33:02 · answer #9 · answered by Desiree 1 · 1 0

you must not be a mother because you would not had ask this question. It does not matter how old her son is when he die.She will always have a place in her hearth for him. and another thing a child does not replace another child.Yes it is a tragic when a mother losses any child.

2006-09-15 19:36:07 · answer #10 · answered by cmaymay26facaringperson 2 · 1 0

you have got to be kidding me.... obviously you don't have any kids or you would not ask this question.... So what you are saying as long as there is a replacement no parent should mourn the loss of their child?

2006-09-15 19:21:48 · answer #11 · answered by Jessica 5 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers