2006-09-15 16:07:18 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Not as long as our fearless president can send them over to other places based on a lie. His cohorts agree with him so what the hey. Some repuke's are begining to put a little space between Bush and them so there might be a sqeak of hope. I hope.
2006-09-15 16:17:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
Taking them out of harm's way puts you back into harm's way. It's just that the men and women in the U.S. armed forces accept the role they have been given while people like you just sit around spewing anti-bush rhetoric.
The Republicans support the idea that fundamentalist muslims pose a threat to the world, because of that threat, they are obligated to use military force where diplomacy fails.
Had the UN taken a more assertive stance against these terrorists from the begining, The U.S. wouldn't have had to create and deploy a fighting force alone. Instead the UN has allowed resolutions to be ignored by many of the major middle-eastern countries. If you do some research you would see that it was the league of nations which failed to act during Germany's mobilization before World War 2, likewise the UN has allowed many of these countries to do what they want at their leisure. The U.S. has deemed these middle eastern countries dangerous and has dealt with their threat accordingly.
War may not be pretty, but it is, unfortunately, often times necessary.
2006-09-16 11:12:15 · answer #2 · answered by Golferbob84 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes, it has gone too far.
everyone is blaming the wrong people for the wrong reasons.
your friends' son would still be alive if it wasn't for that clownmonkey Bush. it was Bush's decision to send troops into Iraq and soon enough, more young son's of America will die there because they are fighting a war that cannot be won by conventional weapons.
you are fighting an enemy who does not fight fair and does not care about innocent children. they will kill all who get in their way.
Bush is going to call upon more young men in America to fight for this war that is truely meaningless. Why do I say that?
because it will help nobody but his own buddies. All the contracts to rebuild Iraq will go to his golfing buddies and friends of Dick Cheney.
All your friend's mother will get for her son's death is a letter from Donald Rumsfeld saying how great her son was and it won't even be signed by him..it's a copy of his signature!!!
what an insult!
seriously, Bush is the problem.
those protesters are wrong for slamming the military..the military are just doing their job.
Bush is the problem because he's telling the military to go fight for something that doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
and what's worse is what's still to come.
Bush will draft more young men to fight in Iran in the next month or so when that war will begin.
2006-09-16 03:50:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Take the troops out of harm's way? What good are they if they aren't in the fight?
We do not have the best military the world has ever seen just so that we can cut and run any time there is a little bit of danger. I hate to see soldiers killed, they signed up to kill and they know that the possibility of getting killed comes with the territory.
2006-09-16 00:43:49 · answer #4 · answered by royalrunner400 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Traditionally Republicans support the military more than Democrats. And to take the troops out of "harms way" sounds like an oxy-moron.
2006-09-15 23:10:50 · answer #5 · answered by brewbeer212 4 · 6⤊ 1⤋
If the troops believe in what they're doing, why can't you?? Do you understand that to cut and run now would mean that all those men and women died in vain?? There's a job to finish. We have to stabilize that country. We've already captured Al Qaeda factions there and we need to clear the rest out. Just last week, we caught a major leader in Baghdad. Every post like this just brings morale down. This is what our military does. Let them finish the job before the job ends up on American soil.
2006-09-15 23:43:09 · answer #6 · answered by HEartstrinGs 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Wow, As A US MARINE that has spent 30 years fighting for this great country, I'm still amazed at the stupid ignorance of people like you. Enough said, I won't stoop to your level, but I will say this, To all my brothers and sisters in the military fighting for this country Thank You, You are carrying on a great tradition and unlike the puts that asked this question, we support you and pray for you to come home safe, God Bless you all. Semper Fi. MGST WOODALL USMC (retired)
2006-09-16 01:15:08 · answer #7 · answered by basscatcher 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
NO because they only support the WAR. They are always telling us to support the WAR. I however support the troops, they are just doing their job. I totally support the TROOPS, not WAR in which advocates murder and death.
2006-09-15 23:19:15 · answer #8 · answered by M.A.T. 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Interesting.
2006-09-15 23:16:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
There will be NO WITHDRAWAL of troops from Iraq until the Bush family settles its personal vendetta against Saddam Hussein and Dick Cheney finally gets all that OIL swimming underneath Iraq's sands.
In fact, you can pretty much be assured that the U.S.A. will be in total control of Iraq for at least another 20-50 years. That's why they're building the largest embassy in the world on a 104-acre plot of land in downtown Baghdad.
PREDICTION: By spring of 2007 we will be at 'war' with Iran for the very same reason: OIL. All Bush's handlers have to do is find a plausible excuse that the Bush conservative base of dittoheads will believe, and we'll "invade" that country. -RKO-
2006-09-15 23:15:59 · answer #10 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Will the Democrats ever support America?
2006-09-15 23:10:26 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋