According to the Bible, there is nothing wrong with it. Preachers don't talk about it, naturally, but it is definitely in the Bible, in the Song of Solomon (Old Testament). See below. Here is an excerpt:
In Christian discussions concerning oral sex, the Song of Solomon is most frequently cited as an example of scriptural allusion to the act: Like an apple tree among the trees of the forest, so is my beloved among the young men. In his shade I took great delight and sat down, and his fruit was sweet to my taste. (Song of Solomon 2:3)
While the previous passage refers to fellatio, the following can be read as a metaphor for cunnilingus: Awake, O north wind, and come, wind of the south; make my garden breathe out fragrance, let its spices be wafted abroad. May my beloved come into his garden and eat its choice fruits! (Song of Solomon 4:16)
And again, the Song of Solomon urges lovers to eat and drink freely of one another’s bodies: I am come into my garden, my sister, my spouse: I have gathered my myrrh with my spice; I have eaten my honeycomb with my honey; I have drunk my wine with my milk: eat, O friends; drink, yea, drink abundantly, O beloved. (Song of Solomon 5:1) This reading of the scriptures portrays the act of oral sex as both natural, like eating, and a joyful expression of love, passion, and sexual sharing between a man and woman.
2006-09-15 13:52:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by LaRue 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Contrary to popular belief, oral sex is not a completely safe alternative to vaginal or anal sex. Chlamydia, human papillomavirus (HPV), gonorrhea, herpes, hepatitis (multiple strains), and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) — including HIV — can be transmitted through oral sex.[14]. However transmission of HIV through fellatio or cunnilingus is relatively rare. Any kind of direct contact with body fluids of a person infected with HIV (the virus that causes AIDS) should be avoided. In 2005, a research study at the College of Malmö in Sweden suggested that performing unprotected oral sex on a person infected with HPV might increase the risk of oral cancer .[15] The risk from most of these types of infection, however, is generally considered far lower than that associated with vaginal or anal sex.
Furthermore, oral sex should be avoided when either partner has wounds or open sores on the genitals or mouth, or bleeding gums in the mouth, or has recently brushed, flossed, undergone dental work, or eaten crunchy foods such as potato chips, all of which can cause small scratches in the lining of the mouth. These wounds, even when they are microscopic, increase the chances of contracting STDs that can be transmitted orally under these conditions. Such contact can also lead to more mundane infections from common bacteria and viruses found in, around and secreted from the genital regions. Because of this, many medical professionals advise the use of condoms in the performance of fellatio (flavoured condoms are available for this purpose) and the use of plastic or latex sheets (dental dams or ordinary plastic wrap) for cunnilingus, although the latter has failed to achieve the same level of widespread use as condoms.
2006-09-16 04:54:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sex between a married male and female in the sight of God is moral.
2006-09-15 13:50:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Birdbrain 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
human beings confuse the notice ethical. It does no longer mean ethical yet potential ordinary. some human beings would say the purpose of intercourse is to make infants so it extremely is immoral. Others would say that considering all human beings does it it extremely is ethical. whether this does not mean ethical.
2016-10-01 00:21:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anyone who has been on the receiving end would know the answer to that.
If it was immoral would you not do it?
2006-09-15 13:56:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I never seen it mentioned in the Bible but I believe if two people are married and in love with one another and with God, there is nothing wrong with it. This is just my thought.
2006-09-15 14:29:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by morris 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I guess it would depend on the situation!
It's not the act...but rather the reason or motive that can make it a bad thing.
2006-09-15 14:03:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Helzabet 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends entirely on your viewpoint.
It is neither unless you choose to make it so.
2006-09-15 13:54:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Left the building 7
·
0⤊
0⤋