I think creationist science is an oxymoron, and I think the museum will be hilarious. I'd visit just to walk around and laugh.
2006-09-15 07:53:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Girl Wonder 5
·
5⤊
1⤋
I think that museum, twenty years from now, will be sort of a cult classic. It will be an oddity that people will laugh about, and possibly go and visit, simply because they'll find it hard to believe that it was actually built.
(Sort of the way people view those tacky hamburger-shaped restaurants you often see on Route 66, etc...)
2006-09-15 14:59:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
They aren't scientists and it's pretty sad they're wasting the money when they could be using it to feed the hungry, give drink to the thirsty, clothe the naked, shelter the homeless, visit the imprisoned, visit the sick, and bury the dead.
You know, all those corporal acts of mercy they're supposed to be doing?
2006-09-15 14:55:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
You can call a turd a gold nugget, but it's still a turd. Having a museum won't legitimize a baseless concept.
2006-09-15 14:53:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Blackacre 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
I think there's no actual science in creation science.
2006-09-15 14:53:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Chris J 6
·
5⤊
1⤋
did creationist god ask for faith or science?
they should have a golden calf out front.
2006-09-15 14:56:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rob 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
You show me someone who was created, and I'll show you an andriod.
2006-09-15 14:56:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋