Krauthammer: Attack on Iran Inevitable
Responding to a question on Iran, President Bush said on Tuesday: "It's very important for the American people to see the president try to solve problems diplomatically before resorting to military force."
"Before" implies that the one follows the other, Charles Krauthammer notes in the Washington Post.
"The signal is unmistakable. An aerial attack on Iran's nuclear facilities lies just beyond the horizon of diplomacy.”
Krauthammer weighs the costs of destroying Iran’s nuclear capabilities – while at the same time warning of the costs of doing nothing.
The mullahs of Iran "are infinitely more likely to use these weapons than anyone in the history of the nuclear age,” he cautions.
The Post columnist points to these costs of attacking Iran:
Economic. An attack on Iran could send oil prices to $100 or even $150 a barrel overnight, leading to a worldwide recession.
2006-09-15
07:10:57
·
8 answers
·
asked by
WORD UP G
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Military