Be prepared for some REALLY stupid answers...
2006-09-15 05:06:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Some of those examples are of apes.
Also we are some what different than we were before the flood. Back then there was twice the air pressure and oxygen level than we have now (know from samples taken from amber). The Bible says that there was an ice shield about our atmosphere (that would keep out harmful rays from the sun). With these healthy things people lived to over 900 years old and grew to over 9 feet tall (you can do a web search about experiments with higher air pressure, the best known one is about a Cherry tomato plant that grew to over 20 feet and gave thousands of tomatoes the size of baseballs).
There have been cave men (there are still some today) they are people who have lost most of the knowledge that their ancestors had.
2006-09-15 05:25:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by tim 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
In essence, they deny it. They claim that some of the bones clearly belong to ape species, while others are clearly modern humans. Sometimes they say they're modern humans that were deformed. Sometimes they say the reconstruction of the skull was done inaccurately, by scientists who had their own agenda.
I do recall reading about a guy who debated various creationists, and when they'd trot out the argument that some skulls were obviously apes, he'd bring out a collection of skull models and ask them which were apes and which were humans. Strangely enough, the creationists - who claimed the dividing line was so obvious - always seemed to pick different dividing lines!
2006-09-15 05:11:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bramblyspam 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Genesis 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
us Gen 11:7
make Psa 100:3
dominion Psa 8:6
27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
God created man and women in the image of God which is His spirit. It' wasn't until Genesis 2 that He placed their spirits into a formed body that was from the dust of the earth.
Genesis 2 :7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
Genesis 2:18 And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.
Genesis 2:21-22 And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;
deep sleep Gen 15:12
22 And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
People took refuge back then in caves.
Hebrews 11:38 (Of whom the world was not worthy:) they wandered in deserts, and in mountains, and in dens and caves of the earth.
We are the ones who gave them the name of cave men and women.
2006-09-15 05:14:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the bible is a collection of stories [like aesop's fables] that one could use to help with everyday situations in life. though some of these lessons may be dated, the general idea stays the same. don't take the bible too litteraly.
although like someone earlier stated,
it really is your decision on what to believe.
2006-09-15 05:10:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by The-School.org 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
They should... because nobody can deny evolution. It's the part the Bible stepped across.
2006-09-15 05:10:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by bizkit_ 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
The fundamentalist would give you an anti-intellectual answer like " Those aren't real, the devil planted them"!
2006-09-15 05:11:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I know the answer
Sense much smoking from your ears
My brain on standby
2006-09-15 05:07:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bloon-Enimalz 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
its YOUR choice to believe the bible or the scientists.
2006-09-15 05:07:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by sweety 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
humans are a unique form.
2006-09-15 05:07:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by wutta-croc 4
·
0⤊
1⤋