2006-09-15 03:59:55 · 4 answers · asked by P.A.D. 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
i know it now, and i had a ball reading mr hendersons letter.
i do not know the reasoning of the followers of intelligent design when they talked the board into teaching it, but i take that it was very much along the lines of mr hendersons argument.
which i find shocking. shockingly stupid, actually... i mean... okay, intelligent desibn is a theory, but for all intents and purposes it is NOT a scientific one. by which i dont mean its contents, but its formality. it does not follow the commonly accepted rules of scientific work.
hence it is NOT science. hence has nothing to do in a science class...
there, problem solved, without even going into details.
oh. about your question.
i dont see why presidents and kings and people of that nature generally should by law be required to endure being derided and laughed at, and a god is not.
wouldnt that be a bit petty and smallminded for an almighty being, dont you think?
2006-09-15 04:19:05 · answer #1 · answered by wolschou 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Talk like a pirate day is coming up, ad you question the the notability of the FSM! You my friend are in need of some noodly appendages upside your head.
2006-09-15 11:04:09 · answer #2 · answered by Rob 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Get off that juvenile sillyness already. Every once in a while you come up with that same kiddish garbage. Grow up and wise up.
2006-09-15 11:12:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know. No. RAmen
2006-09-15 11:07:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋