Sure!
(This concerns the logico-deductive method)
Basically, God is infinite, and by virtueof that is pre-axiomic. The particular two axioms He needs to disobey here are the identity and non-contradiction axioms:
Identity: All A is A.
Non-contradiction: There is no thing that is both A and not A.
God disobeying these means that even things that are God are also not God, ie the physical world.
This means that no properties can be assigned to God.
This means that we cannot have evidence of God; such a thing means that we need to be able to say what is God and what is not.
This means that God's existence is unprovable.
QED.
By the bye, I am an atheist!
2006-09-15 00:13:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Such arguments are circular. A negative cannot be proven. At the same time, no one can offer evidence of God's existence, either. If we assumed everything that cannot be disproven was real, we would live in a world more screwed up than this one.
2006-09-15 00:08:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Zombie 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The life of gods is **no longer** unprovable: all you're able to do to coach a god or gods exist is capture certainly one of them off-shield. The non-life of gods **is** unprovable. you won't be able to coach that somebody is a non-smoker; they could smoke in straightforward terms once you're no longer observing. yet considering the fact that "no gods" is the default place, no information is needed.
2016-11-07 09:13:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
there is a single God that is ALLAH.just think on ur own self can such a perfect human being be created by itself??? if yes ten come on ceate a one like urself , but u can never ever....
from the QURAN" [052:035] Or were they created by nothing? Or were they themselves the creators?
[052:036] Or did they create the heavens and the earth? Nay, but they have no firm Belief.
[051:020] And on the earth are signs for those who have Faith with certainty.
[051:021] And also in your own selves. Will you not then see?
[052:037] Or are with them the treasures of your Lord? Or are they the tyrants with the authority to do as they like?
2006-09-15 00:13:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by MEDICAL GUY 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Love and God are not the subject of mind, which goes to prove or disprove anything based on its incomplete and lame logics.
God can be reached..God can be felt.. if u feel the need ...otherwise He is not interested in our logics and theories
2006-09-15 01:48:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by ۞Aum۞ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No need for non-religionists to prove there is no god...religions have been trying to prove there is a god for thousands of years.
Since they are all still murdering each other over their differences, I think it very safe to say that no one, especially the ones who say there is a god, have shown any proof that there is a god...their actions and divisions over the nature of the supposed creator for thousands of years prove that there is no god.
2006-09-15 00:15:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by stephenjames001 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can say this much. If a theory is not falsifiable, then it isn't much use as a theroy.
If no matter what kind of evidence comes in against your theory, you still find ways to believe it, then it isn't worth much.
Moreover, your question as worded is inadmissable. Sorry.
2006-09-15 00:12:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Self-defeating statement is one that fails to meet meet its own standard.
Contrary beliefs are possible, but contrary truths are not possible. We can believe everything is true, but we cannot make everything true.
There are ordinary agnostics who say that they do not know everything for sure, and then there are the ornery agnostics who say that they cannot know anything for sure.
2006-09-16 15:12:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by SeeTheLight 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
its a negative approach, anything which is unprovable does not necessarily make it true
2006-09-15 00:11:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by bikax1 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Can u prove there is a God?
2006-09-15 00:06:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by chelseafanguy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋