English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

TAMIL, that is, Tamil came first, and not English, English is modelled on Tamil, English did not exist while Tamil had a written form?

The word தாதி was "made up" even before English originated, it means a nurse, and the letter ந் that stands for the symbol of the King, that is a peacock, was put "inside" தா and தி, ந் is the hidden message or God's message or King's power symbol, which in this case is a peacock, தா means Give, Give in the name of the power, and the symbol of Power as represented in Roman form is T, was derived from the phonetic of தி, the "Tha" has a "tail" that emanates from the head and reaches the ground which is a symbol of monarchy, in some forms it is represented as a quill , turban, or headwear, in English it is a crown, the word TAMIL itself is made up in English to represent the phonetics of T + MAIL, or the power of peacock, so Tamil was and is the original right titleholder to the English crown which never even existed until they learnt the concept ?

2006-09-14 22:16:46 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Languages

P.S. compare with the falsity of the Bible that says Adam came first, it is the female that must have come first, in search of the "power symbol" or the missing man, to fill "her" void, so Tamil is female and represents feminine power and English is male and represents symbols of male power, English draws from Tamil as a metaphor to represent and re-charge itself to in fact serve Tamil?

2006-09-14 22:19:50 · update #1

Also compare the form of Lord Siva said to be having Ganges in his head that reaches from his head to reach the feet , the feet is the world, the world is female, God is in the sky and is male?

2006-09-14 22:22:30 · update #2

Its not my job to "convert" others to believe what I say. I have only stated facts as I see them.

Here is more:
C is CO, KO means King in Tamil. Thats how OK originated it - remember it is phonetic representation, not literal, you represent a sound with a symbol that you call the English alphabet - you modelled the English alphabet on Tamil concepts - the concept of identifying with common identity - King - is copied from Tamil, once you had that the language grew powerful as you knew the trick and command - compare all two letter "English" words that end with O - PO, NO, CO, TO, etc. Tamil is the key to cracking the "Da Vinci" code that was never yours in the first place.

2006-09-15 05:21:08 · update #3

I would like to add the info before I forget and you think I dont know, the ந் is the "hidden message" in context just as the English copied it: if you "remove" both sides of the context, then you get the truth, and the truth is represented in physical form by the King's own words, just as if you open the two labial lips you get the vaginal slit, you open a banana skin and you get the banana, you open the orange skin and you get the orange. This is the correct key to Da Vinci code that so many of English speakers who have English as mother tongues, Brits and Americans are even not able to understand this because they have not been exposed to Tamil.

2006-09-15 05:29:08 · update #4

Who owns the land that both Palestine and Israel claim? Remove both sides and you get the truth: All land belongs to the King who represents the physical form of divine power, who owns all universe. Now compare how if you "split" O, or 0, you get two C's so the truth is BETWEEN two C's, is hidden, and represents power . So the testes is represented as a scrotal bag which is a oblate like an earth, the two C's each have a scrotum and the truth grows from it.. If you look at the tree root it spreads in 360 degree fashion, two C's combined, then it grows from that base. So while English is NOT WRONG, it is still NOT your original idea, the credit is still Tamil's.

2006-09-15 05:33:51 · update #5

Why is a coin round? Why is a sun round, Sun contains the light power in the form of heat and light - the bell is round and generates sound energy it is sound power, the coin has two sides but the coin is a 2D representation - the sun is in 3D so it is two hemispheres of activity in the form of 2C's, thats why the "2" is represented in heart form - the labial form, so the "Arabic" or "Islamic" way of representing 2 is WRONG and God cant stand it and wants to SUBJECT-ELIMINATE it so he can replace it with other, better performing subjects.

2006-09-15 05:37:39 · update #6

8 answers

So what is your point? Is anyone suggesting that English is the oldest language? It would hardly be surprising that Tamil is closer to Proto-Indo-European than English is.

2006-09-14 22:21:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

English, in its modern form, has only been around about 500 years. English, as a whole, has been around since the 450's.

Old English is derived, not from Tamil, but, Germanic, Nordic, Celtic, and Latin.

Honestly, the only way Tamil could be considered a forebearer or influencer of English is if Latin was directly based on Tamil, so much so, that most of our words come from Latin, and therefore Tamil.

However, a good portion of our words are quite similiar to Germanic words, and most words that come from Latin are merely scientific terms, prefixes and suffixes, and philosophic terms, very rarely are they used in common dialogue (prefixes and suffixes aside, of course).

In all honesty, I see more of a resemblance to Hebrew and Greek, in English, than I do of that in Tamil, as a distant ancestor.

I doubt anyone who has a serious interest in languages would honestly say that English came first. That'd be a crock, as we are one of the youngest of the commonly-spoken languages. However, to say that English is modelled on Tamil is also a falsehood, as neither is remotely similiar, in any aspect, to each other. American English is modelled after British English, which in turn (after a good many centuries) is modelled after Germanic.

And might I ask what crown is it that you seek, that all Anglo-Saxon people should stop speaking an Anglo-Saxon language? That the lingua franca of this era become an ancient language (one, from nations who have done little to modify life as we know it in a positive way) instead of a modern one (one, from the nations who revolutionized the world)?

2006-09-15 06:09:16 · answer #2 · answered by seraphim_pwns_u 5 · 0 0

Wow.. You are completley insane.

Notice that when you divide the O or 0 horizontally you get u and n. This is the secret divinty that gives you the UN, or United Nations, therefor the English language comes from the sun which is also round, but this object is 3-D which is why it represents the number 1, so the UN is number 1, which is why the United Nations rules over all nations, and sets rules for all nations to follow. This is why God hates the number 2 when represented with a heart, because the number one, when represented by the sun, already has 2 hemespheres, and the number 2 when cut veritcally gives you 2 Cs, but when cut horizontilly gives you m and v and when you take off half the m you get n, ther by giving you nv. Because the number two, when represented by a heart, NVs (envies), the number one, represented by the sun.

2006-09-15 05:30:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

English is not modelled on Tamil. There are many different families of languages, and just because one came before another does not mean that the later one came FROM the earlier one. They may have developed unrelatedly, and later on, when the cultures came in contact with one another, have absorbed a few words and terms from one another. There were other languages before Tamil, as well.

2006-09-15 05:21:26 · answer #4 · answered by smurfette 4 · 0 0

How do you come to this conclusion? English bears no resemblance to Tamil. The sentence structure is completely different. Tamil is a Dravidian language, English is Indo-European.

Additionally, a metaphor is rhetorical comparison to two or more unrelated subjects. It isn't used as you're using it.

2006-09-15 05:29:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You are completely out to lunch. English is a GERMANIC language in the Indo-European family of languages. Tamil is a completely unrelated language of the Dravidian family. Stop doing so many drugs.

2006-09-15 08:33:32 · answer #6 · answered by Taivo 7 · 0 0

You can only prove something that's true, and even then there might be difficulties. Your little theory sounds like utter and total and badly researched nonsense.
Forget about it.

2006-09-15 08:09:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Arabic is pretty old too, though I dont think older than Tamil.
How about Sanskrit?

2006-09-15 05:28:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers