No. My faith exceeds my material needs. I believe in Lord...sight unseen. I know his presence and feel his hand. He is alive and I rejoice.
2006-09-14 10:10:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ron B. 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
No, but if I told you the planet was really run by masons, you just can't see them, would you believe me? People are afraid of the unknown, which is where religion steps in and really explains nothing but, it says don't worry because god knows all. That's ok then, at least someone does. Right? I don't think so. We should not be afraid because we don't know everything, or if we can't explain or understand something we should not invent a mystical ruler who does
2006-09-14 17:16:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by mrmoo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
My reality ONLY consists of things that are real. What a novel concept, ehh?
2006-09-14 17:13:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by The Resurrectionist 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Things need to be testable. The less important they are, the less reality required. The more outrageous a claim, the more evidence is required.
2006-09-14 17:11:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by jesse_o_ellis 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only thing that is real to me is how I feel. The source of my feelings is only conjecture and we all have the power to imagine anything we want, but that does not make it real. I think some folks have trouble distinguishing between what is real in their mind and what is real in the universe.
2006-09-14 17:15:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by tomleah_06 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Things I KNOW are there is my reality. Not that I think I know...
2006-09-14 17:08:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes.
We only have our five senses. Whether we interpret the universe directly or through our technology there is nothing else that can be understood.
2006-09-14 17:13:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you summed up reality pretty well there! personal reality is the sum of our sensorial environment
2006-09-14 17:12:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by prometheus_unbound 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pretty much what you said. My observables and my knowledge and my logic for making sense of new observables in the context of prior knowledge.
If I can't observe it, I can't know it or test it.
2006-09-14 17:09:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're not going to go "god of the gaps" on me, are you?
I just got done spanking someone down for that already.
2006-09-14 17:11:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋