2006-09-13 21:34:49 · 13 answers · asked by Pervy_Pirate 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Tee hee. Your questions are getting more and more nonsensical. :D Keep posting, please. You give me something to laugh at on this bleak, rainy day!
2006-09-13 21:42:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Actually it's the heavenly former that I'm interested in...
However, in any case, I'd be all for a heavenly ladder. I mean, why not, right? If I could find one, I'd climb it. Even if it's just a big giant at the top shouting 'fee fi fo fum'...
But I have a feeling that if I tried to climb it, God would change my language so that I couldn't talk to anyone...
2006-09-13 22:03:33 · answer #2 · answered by XYZ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know what? If you are just going to come on here and be a bigot and put atheists down, at least learn how to spell a simple word like ladder.
Educate yourself before you try and educate others.
2006-09-13 21:37:21 · answer #3 · answered by iswd1 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
ATheist by definition wouldn't bother climbing a ladder because th ere is no proof that that the ladder would provide them with the attention the pathetic "sum of all parts" accidental life-forms would need to to see their names in the paper. Look at me ... I'm sooo non accountable!!!!
2006-09-13 21:43:55 · answer #4 · answered by mitchskram 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You know, anyone with the screen name Pervy Pirate should probably spend a little more time thinking about what's wrong with himself in a spiritual as well as a tasteful sense before they even attempt to philosophize about another's place in the hereafter.
2006-09-13 21:38:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Who is 'Lonesome George' - and what is a 'heavenly latter'?
2006-09-13 21:37:39 · answer #6 · answered by Tish-a-licious 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
"introduction" implies purpose. not all platforms form/improve in accordance to a preconceived objective implied by employing "purpose". A preconceived objective is the outcome of organization, a resources in basic terms latest in organisms with calculation organs(brains). so that you're presuming a mind the position it really is thoroughly unjustified. "introduction" is likewise an unjustified time period to apply ex-nihilo, as you haven't any justification for assuming there develop into an "initial state" of existence(that existence went from a state of "not something" to a state of latest). And "introduction" ex-materia is only a synonym for substitute, and the re-id of thoughts. for instance even as a chippie takes products of "timber" and creates a "table", no count number all started latest, in spite of the undeniable fact that the criteria for our theory "table" develop into fulfilled, re-figuring out the count number in those problems with "timber" as "table".
2016-11-26 22:39:26 · answer #7 · answered by egbe 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you TRYING to ask stupid questions or does it just come naturally? Oh, you're a christian,it probably comes naturally.
And it's ladder not latter
2006-09-13 21:37:08 · answer #8 · answered by Nemesis 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
that heavenly what? "latter" is defined as "relating to or being the second of two items".
2006-09-13 21:38:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's time for me to go to bed. The questions are getting more ridiculous by the minute!
2006-09-13 21:40:33 · answer #10 · answered by Monique 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋