Bin Laden has recently claimed that muslims have nukes in America...considering the seriousness of the matter, wouldnt it be wise to set up community watch groups that mointer Islamic communities?
Its not fool-proof but better than nothing.
2006-09-13 16:36:01 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yo CPC!! Cool....we will get it rolling.
2006-09-13 16:41:48 · update #1
Yo CPC!! Cool....we will get it rolling.
2006-09-13 16:42:51 · update #2
whattup las vegas steve!
yeah, i'm down with that idea.
2006-09-13 16:39:19 · answer #1 · answered by CPCFC 1 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Have you forgotten Oklahoma City? Those guys were about as Anglo as you could expect.
Most Islamic communities are embarassed by these nutcases who have hijacked the trappings of the religion to justify their murders and terrorism. And frankly, I'd be more worried about the Russian organized crime families having nuclear weapons than Bin Laden.
2006-09-13 23:44:23 · answer #2 · answered by eriurana 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It would be prudent only if you are a racist, bigotted, narrow minded, blind, hatred spreading, ignorant, unintelligent, inhuman, assinine facist.
Why dont we all form watch groups for all the minorities - ethnic, religious or gay?
Why dont we form watch groups on everyone who doesnt share our own personal beliefs?
Why dont we start spreading hate material while we are at it?
Heck. Lets organize some vigilante groups and be proactive and go hang them all before they attempt anything?
Or we could back track and psychoanalize your question.
What are you afraid of? Why are you directing your fears into prejudice? Why dont you go visit a mosque and meet the people there and make friends? Why does your fear turn into hate?
Read a book or go to school.
2006-09-13 23:48:57 · answer #3 · answered by OldManOnTheMountain 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If you target the Islamic community with such intense prejudice, then it will snowball into another Holocaust-- this time with Muslims instead of Jews.
Quite honestly, if you want to censor one religion, you have to censor them all, which is not only incredibly anti-American, but also unfeasible.
2006-09-13 23:42:50 · answer #4 · answered by ethereality 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Hm. I guess that would be a good idea, as long as you are ready to discard this:
Bill of Rights
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Amendment III
No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
Amendment VII
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
2006-09-13 23:46:44 · answer #5 · answered by Smiley 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
what are they waiting for then, we have a watch group all ready its called the American public. if you see something that bothers you call Homeland Security , you will get a response
2006-09-13 23:42:03 · answer #6 · answered by Bob 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes! Join the crowd!
2006-09-13 23:37:41 · answer #7 · answered by whynotaskdon 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I think its a good idea but I have a feeling you can be sued in civil court for infringing on their rights.
2006-09-13 23:40:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anna 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
you are sich ,ho often does the US bumb them,and you don, care ,becouse you think only americans are human.hy don`t you hang yourself .
2006-09-13 23:47:30 · answer #9 · answered by 16 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, they need close monitoring
2006-09-13 23:40:25 · answer #10 · answered by iamwhoiam 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋