in Iraq when they estimated $5 billion (Rumsfeld) to $100 billion (Santorum) to the war will pay for itself and we will be greeted with flowers (Cheney)
2006-09-13 13:00:49 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
they were stupid but democrats arent any better...VOTE FOR NADER
2006-09-13 13:02:01 · answer #1 · answered by pittisit43 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Yes all Republicans are liars, what party got us into Vietnam again? War is expensive, that is to be expected. and like you really care about the war price tag anyway. Both parties spend our tax dollars like it grows on a tree, If you want to make a political point about the war than make it, because the price of the war has nothing to do with anything, it doesn't help your cause, and it's not going to bring our troops home safely. No one is going to say "$460 billion on the war, well I'm against it now."
2006-09-13 20:22:46 · answer #2 · answered by Kitty 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The cost of the war in Iraq is $2 trillion over ten years. A report was issued by several independent economists.
The federal debt under Republicans will be $9 trillion in 10 years.
We have a $38 billion trade deficit under Republicans.
The working class tax payers will pay this.
2006-09-13 20:09:35 · answer #3 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Lies to you perhaps. Estimates of the cost of the war are subject to a lot of different thing. As are the actual cost of the war. Have you bothered to add up the costs of the terrorist attack on the US and the World? I bet you haven't. Its too bad we're the only country out there who cares about EVERYONE. Yes, sometimes as a nation we are A*sholes, but the world is full of pu*sies and d*cks and if the a*sholes weren't around to protect the pu*sies and put the d*cks in there place the world would be a much more dangerous place.
2006-09-13 20:05:31 · answer #4 · answered by WitchTwo 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
This figure of 460 billion dollars is money we don't have, it's tacked on to the national debt, something you will have to repay one day.
Do you like that idea?
Or, would you rather save money and use the real weapons stashed away for a rainy day, and from the looks of things, that rainy day is today.
Dust them off, then let them go, and later we'll sort it all out when the dust settles.
However, that won't happen.
Instead, it's spend, spend, spend and sink more and more money into a lost cause.
When pay-up time rolls around, I hope you won't mind forking over your life savings for this crap going on today.
2006-09-13 20:12:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I find it very amusing that none of the Republicans can find anything positive to say about Bush or the war. All they can do is lash out and attack the Democrats. That's called an ad hominem argument, and it's what people do when they don't have a leg to stand on and they know it.
2006-09-13 20:05:51 · answer #6 · answered by ConcernedCitizen 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Frankly, I don't trust any of the SOBs whether they're Republicans or Democrats. They are all a bunch of poll-reading cowards afraid to voice an original opinion. I despise the whole bunch.
2006-09-13 20:03:44 · answer #7 · answered by rlw 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You seem to know more than other people yet you dont seem to be willing (like the demacrats) to admit this all started in the Clinton years,(FACT)
2006-09-13 20:38:07 · answer #8 · answered by saturn 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Is there anyone left who believes the Democrats have completely lost their minds?
I for one do!
2006-09-13 20:02:49 · answer #9 · answered by Starla_C 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
the bush spend millions or even billions I would expect that they are lying to the american people how much they are spending on the war it is on in the zillions which they bring our men home
2006-09-13 20:04:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Iraq was a dumb move, now we are stuck there and BUSH won't admit it takes MANY more troops to secure the place. Bush is WRONG about IRAQ
That is $1,360.00 for every man, woman and child in the USA
2006-09-13 20:02:48 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋