Thank you, Will. Well spoken...er...written. ;D
__________________________________________
Later.......
The above remark was not meant to be condescending, I really meant that I agree whole heartedly...Folks should take the time to read links especially if they're looking deeply into a spiritual matter.
2006-09-13 11:24:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by adrift feline 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
I believe if someone was to post a proof of God existence people would not believe it far more to read it.
2006-09-13 18:30:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by charmaine f 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
If there were proof of God's existence, I don't think he'd need yahoo answers to get the word out. Can you try to be more condescending?
2006-09-13 18:24:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by abrainconnected 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
I would think proof of god's existence wouldn't take more than a few sentences.
Keep it concise!
2006-09-13 18:24:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by DontPanic 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
You have a point. Although, I don't know how you can prove the existence of God with any amount of text.
2006-09-13 18:26:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
There is no proof of God's existence.
2006-09-13 18:40:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rance D 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
So, are you saying you have proof of God's existance? other than religious text books, I mean?
2006-09-13 18:28:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by judy_r8 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes, If someone doesn't read the whole section I don't believe they have the right to even comment about it.
2006-09-13 18:24:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Scott 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
Yeah i'm sure they wouldn't go to the news stations or papers, i'm sure the news would be broken on google answers.
lmao
edit: EarthAngel what about the laws of physics... . . ?
2006-09-13 18:27:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by Fluffy 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
How long it is is not important. It is how relevant the question is. If its interesting people will read it. If it's not they wont.
2006-09-13 18:26:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by malcy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋