Why Science can't explain Love? Does not mean Love doesn't exist or science can't explain everything?

Question

-if u r going to quote from a souce, please add why u agree with it. I see a lot of quotes and people who write them haven't really though about it.
-I agree with science %100 when they r unbias. Athies ones twist facts into their advantage and believer scientist twist into their advantage. & there r some which r unbias. they r very reasonable in their train of though.
-PLEASE FOLLOW A RIGHT TRAIN OF THOUGH. if U QUOTE GIVE LOGICAL ANSWER. OTHERWISE WE DO NOT LEARN ANYTHING/

Answer 1

Love is an emotion and is covered under sociology and psychology. Both are sciences.

Answer 2

With every day pass, our country is getting into more and more trouble. The inflation, unemployment and falling value of dollar are the main concern for our Government but authorities are just sleeping, they don’t want to face the fact. Media is also involve in it, they are force to stop showing the real economic situation to the people. I start getting more concern about my future as well as my family after watching the response of our Government for the people that affected by hurricane Katrina.

According to recent studies made by World Bank, the coming crisis will be far worse than initially predicted. So if you're already preparing for the crisis (or haven't started yet) make sure you watch this video at http://www.familysurvival.tv and discover the 4 BIG issues you'll have to deal with when the crisis hits, and how to solve them fast (before the disaster strikes your town!) without spending $1,000s on overrated items and useless survival books.

Answer 3

Well, first of all, the idea of someone with your communication skill having the audacity to use the word "LOGICAL" is laughable, but I'll bite.

No. Science cannot explain everything. But it is an evolving discipline. It adapts to new information. Religion clings to writings that are millenia old. If a new concept comes along that cannot be confirmed by these ancient texts, that concept is rejected.

As for love, I think phermones play a part, and human emotion. Why does one person like chocolate and another prefer vanilla? This is a combination of molecular interactions and human emotional response to said interractions. This neither confirms nor denies the existence of a Creator being.

Since your question is largely unintelligable, I'm not sure that I've answered it, but I hope this helps.

Cheers.

Answer 4

Of course Science can't explain everything... they change their official answer on everything every 10 years...

Anyone who did any study of Pluto could have known it wasn't a planet.

But the medical community/science can explain love.

Love causes a chemical reaction like chocolate or drugs or near death experiences.

It is a rush of dopamine from brain to the body.

Emotions cause chemical reactions in the body, all which are like drugs really.

That is why an angry person continues to be an angry person, and also why its hard for depressed people to become updepressed.

Because the more your body releases a chemical for an emotion, the more your body gets used to it and wants it.

So the human subconsciously finds/creates/allows for reasons to feel that emotion, and do so more and more often.

Eventually, they just become an angry person, or a depressed person because their body chemically needs this, and they give it to them.

Its the same as a chemical drug addiction. Your body wants it, and you eventually give in.

Unless you learn to realize this and actively try to stop it.

Answer 5

technological know-how is the astonishing device, in spite of the fact that it rather is incorrect. technological know-how is there to furnish the perfect rationalization achieveable at that factor, in accordance to the evidence, lines and documents we've. It does not declare "this is the way it rather is, and it rather is basic", it rather is extra "this is how we predict it rather is judging from the evidence we've accessible. it rather is the perfect rationalization we can provide on the 2nd." It has a proof for many issues. those issues, in spite of the fact that, may be defined fantastically basically by technological know-how. in the event that they're experienced with the help of the guy, it ought to probably be a hallucination. on the working table, you may get little oxygen to the suggestions, which will make you have some extraordinary desires and hallucinations which you think of is/are actual. The ghost reports may be a reaction comparable to that of an arachnophobe consisting of myself. as quickly as I enter a place or an area the place there's a great danger that there are spiders in, i gets chills down my backbone and picture the spiders everywhere. i gets irritating. it ought to be a similar reaction interior the ghost reports. homes or places look previous and such, and frightening, and it ought to or would possibly no longer in good shape the define of a classic haunted abode you hear approximately in thoughts, and so which you think of issues everywhere. there is of project that those are actual, yet i do no longer think of so. have not seen any evidence for it.

Answer 6

Love, as well as any other emotion can not 100% be proved as a tangible item, yet we all feel their effects.

One poster was correct in stating that Sociology and Psychology do in fact study the effects of the emotions and they are a part of the science institution. But, studying the effects is just that, effects to prove the existence, but to examine what they actually are (the emotions) is a completely other matter.

There is no 100% proof of their existence becasue as far as science is concerned, it is not a physical form of matter to which physical examination can be applied.

The same goes for thoughts, what are they? Well, science has defined thought as an electrical impulse within the brain which reacts with certain chemicals to define the result of thoughts; behavior. But once again, it is only an observation of the effects, but not the thing itself. Science can not examine an exact thought; example: thinking of a bike. Science can only examine the effects of what that thought creates through the effects of emotion, which in turn creates a tangible visible Action created from the emotion of the thought.

In fact, no one can prove that what we feel, what we think, of what we personally experience through the use of our senses, is exactly the same as someone else, or anyone else. The only thing which can be observed is the effect at which those thoughts, feelings, or emotions are presented by our actions.

So, Does love really exist? no one can say 100% for sure.

But can we oursleves feel the effects of Love? I would have to say yes, but in our own personal ways.

To answer your second question:
Science does an excellent job at explainig things pertaining to the physical, tangible world. But, it can not (and neither can religion) explain 100% that of the non-physical. That's where theories and opnion come in to play. After all a theroy is nothing mor than an opinion at it's basic level, and the same is said for faith.

Though I believe this is my opinion and yours may differ.

Answer 7

First, you must be able to express yourself, using logical trains of thought before you can demand that of anyone else. I could BARELY get through your paragraph.

Remember, good science is about CLARITY of thought and process.

I only offer one piece of the puzzle: That there is no scientist that has claimed that science has explained everything. Add to that, no one can EVER claim that there are things science can EVER explain. Science is about the exploration. One LEARNS how to be a scientist by repeating the research of the past. One BECOMES a scientist when he attempts to learn something new.

You may not be aware, but science has made many inroads into explaining the phenomenon of "love." New tools and methods have taught us much about what goes on on the human mind.

Stay tuned.

Answer 8

Who says science can't explain love? Have you read the research literature on it? We've got pretty good explanations.

Oh, and of course science hasn't explained everything. That doesn't mean that it can't, though I suspect that there probably are things that science cannot explain. Big deal. It does a great job of explaining so much.

Follow-up question: Why can't religion explain anything at all? And why do so many people think that it does?

Answer 9

Science cant explain everything today. we cannot seek the total earth each and every inch of it.
Science keep changing. Its discovery.
Greek scientist thought the heart is our thinking part long time before. Now we know its the brain. we have gadgets to check the brain in some ways. May be later we will find something inside the brain which has more power.
But the wet software is hard to analyze.
It will take another couple of years
I'm stupid scientist , don't believe what i write.

Answer 10

By "Science" what are you referring to? Empirical Science, or something else? Empirical science requires knowledge that can be quantified or explained by the five human senses: touch, taste, smell, sound, and/or sight. Since there are many things which exist and are true, yet exist outside the realm of what empirical science can explain, there must be some other way or ways of obtaining knowledge of those things; the emotions are certainly one of them: love, hate, envy, greed, etc.

If you have ever experienced love, whether it be erotic love, or filial love, or the love of mother, father, grandmother, grandfather, then you have experienced something that empirical science cannot provide proof for OTHER than through its effects which can be observed through the senses.

The conclusion to be drawn is that reality does not consist of only those things which a person can observe or experience through those five senses; therefore, there must be something more than purely empirical science.

Answer 11

Love is an emotion. By definition.
Emotions are a state of personal being and mind. By definition.
The mind is an emergent behavior of the brain. By neurology.
Love is therefore an emergent behavior of the brain. By logical deduction.

If you'd like, I can go into the biochemistry of love. I could mention that the biochemical state of the brain associated with love is significantly no different than that of eating large amounts of chocolate.

So... what was that about proof?


-------------

Love is a neurological reaction that is initiated in the medula oblongata, which facilitiates all of the 'survival' emotions (those associated with attraction and aversion). The primary known triggers for it are similiarity, familiarity, difference, and need-fulfillment. Why people react with a love response is determined by their neurological basis as interpreted by their previous experiences. This is why for some people, they will fall in love with their exact opposite, while others will find love in someone exactly like them. It's a combined effect of their particular wiring and their prior experience.

In essence, it's a cascade effect beginning in the brain stem that propagates to the frontal cortex (where complex thought occurs). The physiological reactions to love (increased persperation, muscle agitation, 'racing heart') are caused along the pathway as various regions of the brain are stimulated by the cascade wave.