2006-09-13 06:15:40 · 6 answers · asked by flyingpig 1 in Consumer Electronics ➔ Cameras
If you can afford the extra money that the 400D, since it has an extra 2 megapixels, and a few other impovements. There is a reiew site listed below.
2006-09-13 07:28:34 · answer #1 · answered by Allan M 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare_post.asp?method=sidebyside&cameras=canon_eos400d%2Ccanon_eos350d&show=all says the only difference is the pixel count and the LCD size, which is 3/4" bigger on the 400D. There may be other differences that you would find in a written review, but they sure spec out pretty similarly.
I wonder if the 350D is better in low light, using the argument that packing more MP's a the same size sensor increases noise that we hear when some compare Nikon's CCD to Canon's CMOS. Anyone???
2006-09-13 18:58:14 · answer #2 · answered by Picture Taker 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If it were my money, I'd get a 350D and put the $200 difference towards my lens collection.
The biggest differences between the 350D and 400D are an extra 2MP, and a dust-reduction system. To me, that doesn't justify the higher price.
2006-09-13 17:00:13 · answer #3 · answered by OMG, I ♥ PONIES!!1 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
400D is a lot better. i would go for 400d if i was asked to choose.
2006-09-15 14:08:37 · answer #4 · answered by QA Guy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
400D
2006-09-14 07:42:10 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am using the EOS 20D and it is perfect.
2006-09-13 16:33:09 · answer #6 · answered by FAA 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋