2006-09-13 06:11:20 · 17 answers · asked by gokart121 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
The latest 'posers' are anti-illegals, several have shown up now, does it mean they have turned and they are now pro illegal?
Gokart, it's happening on both sides; can you give your best argument why this is?
The issue is not whether anyone approves of the person being impersonated; the issue is why are impersonations happening on both sides, and whether they have an argument; it appears that if the posers support letting people in illegally, we now have at least 4 anti-illegals who have ''turned?"
2006-09-13 07:33:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 9⤋
It is more cost effective to let them come in illegally and then give them amnesty, because with amnisty they would have to pay taxes. If we try to keep them out, they will still come, and we will pay too much for enforcement.
Since it is illegal immigration versus what the system currently is, I vote for illegal immigration. If I need to come to America to escape oppression or to help feed my children, or pay medical bills for my wife, or I want to be reunited with family, then I'll do it illegally, rather than wait on a list for 20 years with no promise I'll ever be allowed in.
We all beleive at some level that disregarding laws in order to survive is sometimes unavoidable.
Everyone seemed to say "No big deal" when people in NEw Orleans looted grocery stores for food to survive. As a Christian, I can undertand caring about the survival and well being of others. Somehow though, people dont see the similarities to the plight of illegal immigrants -- many of whom are retreating from worse plight.
2006-09-13 06:18:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
lmao @ kubrikan has a poser....yea right whatever !! (why people still defend that cup is beyond me...)
There is no argument, most of the arguments to support illegal immigration is coming from a "humane" issue. But I'm not buying into that. You don't run from problems you stay the course and meet them head on.
2006-09-13 06:24:21 · answer #3 · answered by Hold em Rox 6 · 7⤊ 0⤋
Another solution to one of our country's problems...
Bring all our troops home from Iraq to guard the border. When they catch an illegal immigrant crossing the border, hand him a canteen, rifle, and some ammo and ship him to Iraq .
Tell him if he wants to come to America then he must serve a tour in the military.
Give him a soldier's pay while he's there and tax him on it.
After his tour, he will be allowed to become a citizen since he defended this country. He will also be registered to be taxed and be a legal patriot.
This option will probably deter illegal immigration and provide a solution for the troops in Iraq and the aliens trying to make a better life for themselves.
If they refuse to serve, ship them to Iraq anyway without the canteen, rifle, or ammo.
Problem solved.
2006-09-13 06:14:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is posers on both sides. There is no argument that can really be made that can justify breaking the law. No one is holding guns to the heads of many who are coming.
Since someone said on board that Yahoo said I have an extra ID--I would like him (he did change names fast-maybe a she and I saved post. On a deleted Renagate post ) to print that here for me so I can ask Yahoo--along with their ID, who said this! And who from Yahoo wrote this. This is a True Challenge--let me see that post from Yahoo and the proof. I plan on taking it to the Corporate office personally soon if they care to share. Well Analysis?
I believe he is a friend of your BARBIE-please pass that along. You are mentioned in email I got--all copied!
2006-09-13 14:31:09 · answer #5 · answered by *** The Earth has Hadenough*** 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
No one is suggesting to let people in illegally. The propositions are to amnesty the existing ones here already and to loosen the requirements for getting in in the future.
That all being said, for businesses, it means cheaper labor all around and higher profits as the cost of business is less.
2006-09-13 06:14:44 · answer #6 · answered by kingstubborn 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I dont know about posers but I for think that the Statue of Liberty is crying her eyes out from the load she is carrying. Maybe she will drop a few million!!!!!!
2006-09-13 06:15:28 · answer #7 · answered by shirley e 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The one the lobbyists make for thier corporate employers - it lets us hire people at cheaper rates of pay so we don't have to pay a living wage to American citizens. Why do you think the pro-business Bush administration is so gung-ho for amnesty?
2006-09-13 06:15:05 · answer #8 · answered by J T 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Kubrickian, Alberto and Pancha have "posers" that are racists, why don't you mention them.. why imply all posers are the so called pro illegal answerer's? To answer your question I don't think any argument is being made one way or the other.. it is just childish behavior on both sides.
2006-09-13 06:17:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
the republicans can get richer by having people that work for less than minimum wage? oh wait, that would be a BAD thing.
2006-09-13 06:21:47 · answer #10 · answered by roobs 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋