English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

When we talk about God, we are supposed to do so "philosophically." Why? Why not treat God just like all other objects and devise experiments to detect his presence or absence?

The classic religious response is, "God must remain hidden. If he proved his existence, that would take away faith." This is clever -- here we have an object named God that proves its existence by completely hiding its existence. Of course, in the real world, any object that provides no evidence for its existence is classified as imaginary.

Even more interesting, this object called God, which is supposedly hiding its existence completely, is in the meantime supposedly writing books, answering prayers and incarnating itself. How can that be?

Could it be the reason why we can find no empirical evidence for God's existence is not because "God is a magical being completely able to hide from us." It is because God is imaginary?
Hmmmmmm, yet christians still believe in this fairytale?

2006-09-13 04:54:35 · 6 answers · asked by dino_ou812 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

6 answers

To seraphim:Yes, I can do every one of those empirically.

and no, you still can't prove "god"

2006-09-13 05:00:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I wonder if you are open to a response outwith your own beliefs? To "devise experiments" and to look for "empirical evidence" are useful activities for examining the phenomenal universe. But God is beyond this world and beyond all that we can detect, or conceivably detect, with our scientific instruments and/or our senses. God is the Creator of all these manifest worlds. You cannot detect the Immeasurable with a measuring rod, no more than you can find the center of the Earth by looking around on its surface.

2006-09-13 09:49:13 · answer #2 · answered by MBK 7 · 0 0

Experiments have been done to detect paranormal or supernatural entities, with limited success. Could it be that an omnipotent, omniscient being may be more clever than our fancy scientific instruments? Could it be that he has a purpose for causing us to rely upon faith and answering prayers, giving inspiration, and allowing miracles to occur that scientists don't have a good reason for? I have found plenty of evidence for God's existence in my life. And millions of others have also done so. I'm quite comfortable with my beliefs and don't feel the need to tear down yours like you apparently feel the need to do so to me. Why is that? Could it be that you are really not sure what to believe and you figure that tearing down others will make you feel better about your own deep-rooted insecurity? Perhaps....

2006-09-13 05:00:43 · answer #3 · answered by Open Heart Searchery 7 · 0 1

What about dark matter? They only just found a scrap of possible evidence for it's existence. The scientists who believed in its existence were, in some circles, mocked. But they had faith it was there. Could it be, perhaps, that we simply are yet to discover evidence that God exists?

2006-09-13 04:58:22 · answer #4 · answered by Lisa B 4 · 0 0

chum, I easily have considered a number of your demonic questions, & you've finished each and every thing to attempt to dis-educate God, chum all you've finished develop into made a fool of your self & Proved God, And again you want an answer, yet let us know now to not use the bible, what are you afraid of, Is there something in that bible that makes you sense accountable, come on now, is there, save in concepts, you assert it really is a fairy tale, So even if it really is a fairy tale, why are you attempting so demanding to dis-educate God in case you do not position self belief in God, we've the right to trust contained in the only authentic God. Now you assert that once you communicate about our God that you're to communicate philosophically, why do you, our God is an effortless God. i imagine someplace on your existence & as a lot as now you've been so misable interior that you want everybody else to be sure it your way, that isn't artwork, improve up. what number circumstances do you want to attempt to persuade the international in a unmarried day that God does not exist, He exist, rathere you want it or not. If I informed you that Peter Pan develop right into a fairy tale, which he's, Do i prefer to get in this website 5 circumstances in a unmarried day to attempt to educate to those who peter pan isn't actual. The extra, human beings like you that attempt to dis-educate, you in basic terms stick your own foot on your mouth & educate extra that God does exist.

2016-11-26 21:22:07 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Prove to me the existance of an atom without a microscope.

Prove to me the existance of the distance of stars without using anything that measures red-shift.

Prove to me the existance of "red" if I am blind.

Then I will prove to you the existance of God with the tool of faith.

2006-09-13 04:57:47 · answer #6 · answered by seraphim_pwns_u 5 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers