BEFORE YOU ANSWER, keep in mind, this may be the "Mark of the Beast" that the bible warns humanity about.
If it is, you may be condemning a person to eternal damnation, which may be a fate worse than death.
The program would start with the micro chip being injected in the right arm or hand but, If people try to remove it, you can expect the mark will be injected inside the skull next.
Further, you can also expect to be next, not too far in the future, starting with our military pesonnel.
Lastly, Suppose someone refuses to take "The Mark"; would you support their pursecution too ?
sources:
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=HPIA,HPIA:2005-21,HPIA:en&q=+President+Bush+called+for+high%2Dtech+measures+to+clamp+down+on+Mexican+immigrants%2E
2006-09-13 01:57:43 · 14 answers · asked by Joe_Pardy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
I would be against it, and this is why:
What is legal or acceptable socially in one country may not be legal or acceptable socially in another country, and as illegal immigrants travel back and forth between countries, it would be illegal for one country to "track" them when they are not on our country's soil.
I would also be against it for anyone (including pedophiles), because we do not want our government telling us what we can and can not do with our own bodies (in situations such as abortions, and forced sterilizations), so it would be wrong to allow our government to tell others what to do with their bodies (such as forcing micro chips into their bodies). It would be hypocritical to be against it for some people but not against it for other people.
So I would be against it.
2006-09-13 02:14:11 · answer #1 · answered by AnAvidViewer 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i do no longer think of we've gotten to that factor yet. yet you're precise- it ought to be some thing they do interior the destiny. I basically wish I heavily isn't around, with the aid of fact it sounds bleak. style of like the Matrix "certainty" international. in case you like stiffer borders, basically employ extra manpower. there are a number of people accessible that want jobs, and the situation of beginning protection branch is an danger to place them to paintings, imho.
2016-11-07 05:50:00 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. not all immigrants are mexicans so dont generalize
2. it starts with them to move on with everybody
3. "forced" what immigrants are animals? shame on you, they all are human beings nonetheless
4. would you like it if i forced a chip down your skull??
5. i am not going to discuss what your religious beliefs tells you
6. stop reading crap
2006-09-13 04:26:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The technology exists right now to do that. I am not in favor in implanting anyone. It's not religious, just terribly invasive. We have fingerprints, use them.
2006-09-13 02:25:29 · answer #4 · answered by Thomas D 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
II"m against it without keeping that "mark of the beast" thing in mind.
2006-09-13 02:16:05 · answer #5 · answered by MEL T 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
EEWW. No, I wouldn't support it.
I would support "high tech" camera towers and sensors, however.
You hardly needed the "before you answer" caveat.
2006-09-13 02:14:00 · answer #6 · answered by DAR 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would have been an interesting question to answer had you not "tossed" in your religious thoughts.That ended my opinion on it,this is the immigration category not religion.I will not debate religion here.
2006-09-13 02:29:50 · answer #7 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Do you really believe that fantasy crap about the mark of the beast?
2006-09-13 02:40:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No- I would not support it. We have bigger, more difficult problems to solve than illegal Mexicans.
2006-09-18 21:14:09 · answer #9 · answered by RY 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i think they are already starting it and are going to make it mandatory because of all this identity theft. they will place fear in our hearts and minds
2006-09-13 02:05:55 · answer #10 · answered by Enigma 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋