English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

Probably!! The media should be banned from war zones so they can get on with their job.

2006-09-12 23:04:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

You mean we could stop playing " NICE " and throw the stupid rule book in the trash ?
Search and destroy in a free fire zone , kill them where we find them without restrictions ?
We'd have Osama standing trial in DC , this very minute , Saddam in the cell next to him .
Some LIBERAl LAWYERS would be defending them , paid by the taxpayers , stretching the trial out for at least 10 years .

2006-09-13 08:49:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think the war would be worse if there was no media coverage. Think of it in terms of the mentality of a pre-schooler. If your parents are watching, you are on your best behavior, if they are not, chances are, you would take the opportunity to have more fun (read behave badly).

2006-09-13 07:05:31 · answer #3 · answered by mindrizzle 3 · 0 2

Media wanted that wars will not end so that they will always have business everyday through advertisements in their news.

2006-09-13 05:59:34 · answer #4 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 3 0

No. Luckily for the US, the Communist News Network does not dictate foriegn policy. The President does.

2006-09-13 06:04:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers