English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The earlier living things were reproducing by binary fission or asexual reproduction to produce 2 daughters. Sexual reproduction which neccesitated males came much later. In other words, the first living things were females before males came onboard. Human fetus show this characteristic as all fetus possess virgina at earlier stages before those for males close up to produce penis etc. So, who is liying? Bible or Biology?

2006-09-12 22:04:33 · 16 answers · asked by deleagbeyo 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

16 answers

sorry to say but i dont blieve tat god has created this world coz i blieve in biology.i m a medicl student.
if god had creatd the world so y was onli earth was chosen for life.y not other planets also?????????

2006-09-12 22:11:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If you believe man's fallible word over God, then you are lost in a sea of stupidity. Go ahead and fit in with the world. God says we are not of this world when we are a part of Him. If Christians believe science over the Bible, they are working on destroying God's Word rather than edify it. We think because we get in cars and they take us where we want to go....sometimes, and becuase we can turn on a computer and talk to someone across the world...sometimes, that man can answer everything. The problem is those sometimes. Man makes mistakes, always has, always will, and that will never change. Man interprets the Bible to his suited need to make a point, only to be proven wrong. But the mass of sheeple who want to conform and can't think for themsleves, follow suit with man's opinion rather than be outcasts in the world's opinion. What a shame.

http://planttel.net/~meharris1/mikescorner.html

2006-09-13 05:40:08 · answer #2 · answered by green93lx 4 · 0 0

There are no transitional forms in biology what so ever.

The bible says god designed a man from the dust of the ground and than a woman from the rib of a man. There was no primate ancestory of humans.

If you are into biology you would notice men have one less rib than women.

You as an Religious Evolutionist fail to relize that Evolution has been disproven over 50 years ago.


Now stop spreading your Religion with my tax dallors.

2006-09-13 05:10:37 · answer #3 · answered by Investigation Specialist 4 · 0 0

Bible cannot lie -it's the Word of God Himself, but is a matter of faith if u choose to believe it.
the evolution stuff is just some place to hide , and is rather an insecure hidding place, as new descoveries are daily made.
think about it, what if after some years, after u are dead , your soul in the eternity, those ideas u have lived by are all proven wrong! would be too late to change anything, so come yourself to the real question!

2006-09-13 05:26:50 · answer #4 · answered by cudi de mudi 1 · 0 0

I do not know all there is to know, For the last few days I have been arguing with a guy that will not leave his email and I must respond through the few lines that Yahoo gives me. He is in the same boat as you.. there is a difference between faith and science. Science is observable, demonstrable, and reproducible. Faith is taken basically on what you choose to want to believe...

This biology reference is not real science it is faith. You cannot reproduce that it is just someone that that is there idea and you want to believe it. All of the ideas put together are simply ideas not proof. demonstrable, reproducible, observable. that is science not faith.. you are talking about your faith with scientific terms..

Oh the the reason that the burden of proof is on evolution is that you have been given billions of dollars in tax payer money (my money) and 130 years to "prove it" and you still cannot.. isn't it time we let this fantasy die?

2006-09-13 05:50:59 · answer #5 · answered by 57chevy 3 · 0 0

The lie is in the interpretation of biology. Each fetus possesses an undifferentiated sex organ to start with and that changes into a differentiated sex organ of the appropriate sex.

2006-09-13 07:58:05 · answer #6 · answered by Buzz s 6 · 0 0

I get your point. If the Bible is supposed to be God's word, then apparently He, too, had a problem solving the age-old conundrum of "Which came first...the chicken or the egg?"

2006-09-13 05:15:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

do you believe in the bible? if you do you should stick to your faith and believe the story of Genesis..these stories from the bible are from the Mouth of God, but biology is the study of life according to Man, if you believe what man says it's up to you, but is the knowledge of man greater than God's? this is a matter of belief and faith, you should know where your faith lies..

2006-09-13 05:20:19 · answer #8 · answered by naive_cube 1 · 0 0

How can u compare the power of god and power of human being. With limited capabilities, tools and knowledge.. we can say female produce first. But don’t underestimate the power of god, He most knowledgeable than us.

2006-09-13 05:13:02 · answer #9 · answered by Voltage Transformer 33kV 5 · 0 0

So? this is the same thing as evolution contradicts the genesis (not sega). This will be said to be irrelevant on the grounds that you'd have to believe evolution.

2006-09-13 05:09:35 · answer #10 · answered by Alucard 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers