Atheists don't you need to learn some real logic?

Question

You based your conclusion on reasoning and you claim that reasoning is based on logic. What is your so-called logic based on by which you deny Jesus? It's dependant on some axioms and hypothesis. You are actually blindly believing those hypothesis. But did you ever consider
those secular hypothesis? They can't be proved. For example:
hypothesis no-1:
A cannot be equal to B and not equal to B simultanously.
But this hypothesis is faulty bcoz--A just not only change in space
but in time also. So it can even not be identified with itself in changing space-time, but it might be B in some instant--if B is actually a space-time state of A. So, ur hypotheses are incomplete.
example of Biblical Hypothesis:
(1)True word of God. Proved by all it's miracles, winesses and predictions.(2) God can be in three states simultanously and it is proved.

Answer 1

Amen To That!!!!

Answer 2

Okay, I'm trying to keep a straight face here, but here goes:


You say:

A cannot be equal to B and not equal to B simultanously.

Then you say:

But this hypothesis is faulty bcoz--A just not only change in space
but in time also.

But you are wrong--the hypothesis is NOT faulty because it states clearly that it is impossible for A to equal/not equal B SIMULTANEOUSLY. Since simultaneously means specifically "at the same time" it PRECLUDES a change of A over time.

A can be equal to, or not equal to, B but not both at the time--even if A changes from one state to another so fast it cannot be percieved, it is still not simultaneously both.

religious fanatics should stop trying to pervert/distort science to prop up their shaky agendas--you just end up looking silly.

Answer 3

a million. I actual have by no skill seen a miracle, and the so called miracles of the Bible handed off see you later in the past and have been recorded 30-a hundred and fifty years after the undeniable fact that they might't be trusted. 2. How is it shown that God may be in 3 states concurrently? i've got by no skill seen this, and function purely heard of this interior the Bible. faith isn't actuality. And hypotheses are there to be shown the two astonishing or incorrect. A hypothesis isn't immediately astonishing. From Merriam-Webster's Dictionary: a million a : an assumption or concession made for the sake of argument b : an interpretation of a lifelike subject or subject taken with the aid of fact the floor for action 2 : a tentative assumption made with a view to entice out and attempt its logical or empirical outcomes 3 : the antecedent clause of a conditional fact Having no "God" (no writer of the international and all life) is clever to me basically as having a God (the writer) does to you, so lay off.

Answer 4

That is why a hypothesis is the beginging of the process of testing. You test the hypothesis to see if it equals out correct though every tests. If it does not, you throw it out. There is no 'blind' belief. There is no faith required for belief in the world being round. There is enough proof, evidence, and logic for it to be correct. I can't say the same for Jesus Christ. Where there is faith, there most likely is no fact.

Answer 5

You are one crazy boy aren't you. Haven't you anything better to do, supposed biblical man (who has just spent five minutes on his keyboard attacking aepheists!). Why do you feel the need to attack someone just for having different beliefs, that is not a christian quality, or a quality of any faith for that matter. I'm a baptised roman catholic but i do not follow that or any religion ( incase you thought i was an aepheist).

some statements about god for you -

If god is this almighty, great, loving person who adores the human race and all living things, why, when he decided that the world was shitty and he needed to restart ( i can't be bothered going into that one!) did he take Noah and his family on the ark? The reason i ask is because if Noah and his family are the only decent, compassionate people left would they not try to smuggle people on board or tell god what they thought of his compassion towards the rest of the people, because they never it leads me to think that they could not be good people because to forgive is the greatest quality, and the true measure of a person is their level of compassion and forgiveness towards others, no matter what they have done. God obviously isn't and neither is Noah or his family.

Abraham is told to prove his faith, and the way that nice, good old loving god decides to do this is by asking Abraham to bring his son to the top of a mountain after a long trek to sacrifice him. I can understand someone wanting proof of someones faith, but God's omnipotent, surely he should know if Abraham loves him. After days of walking with his son he loves dearly, thinking about all he's done with his son and what dreams he had for his sons future, the thoughts of what he has to do to his son raging through his mind, (just because god needs some proof !!!!!!!!!!) He then reaches the top, ties his son down, who is now crying and screaming at his father in confusion about what is happening, and then draws the knife over his head to bring it down when god shouts out stop. i was only testing you abraham, it's alright, your sons only **** his pants, will have reoccurring nightmares for the rest of his life, never trust or love his father again and may end up being not too nice to his own children due to his emotional wellbeing. really nice guy isn't he!

when i ask religious people why god lets murders, rapes and so on happen they always say that god is giving us the chance to fix our own problems or something to that effect, and i always reply if thats so whats enough? when will he draw the line and say right i've gave them how many chances, lets stop shipman killing old women or bundy murdering boys e.t.c when does he draw the line? - 10 abductions, 1, 000 violent robberies, 1,000 000 deaths, 1, 000 000 000 000 sexual assaults?

i really don't get him, i understand the need or want some people have to believe in something but please don't ram it down our throats.

Answer 6

reasoning is logic there brain child. You can use logic for anything. Given that you think God and Jesus are true then logic would dictate that you believe the Bible to be true or at least parts of if. I think what you were getting at was rational thought, using rational thought to base your logic off of will always lead to a different out come then if you were to base your logic off of theology. Theology see the paranormal phenomenon that was to have taken place in the bible as true; but rational thought would lead us to believe that it is not true because we do not see these things today. So there you have it, rational thought is entirely different then theology or faith.

Answer 7

This kind of so-called 'question' offends me. I am offended by stupidity, willful ignorance and self delusion... which pretty much sums up the Abrahamic death cults of desert monotheism (Judaism, Christianity, Islam).

It offends me to know that three-quarters of the population of the USA are infected with some sort of insidious mental virus that leads them to the insane certainty that the myths, superstitions, fairy tales and fantastical delusions of a bunch of ignorant Bronze Age fishermen and wandering goat herders represent some kind of cosmic 'TRUTH' about fundamental aspects of existence and reality.

It offends me to know that so many people dwell in a delusional reality in which a 6,000 year-old Earth is seperated from a 6,000 year-old Heaven by a solid 'firmament' structure (the sky).

I am offended by the fact that these people believe that they inhabit a magical universe, which they share with talking snakes (with legs) and donkeys, a shepherd staff that turns into an asp, demons chased out of people and into pigs, friendly spirits, evil spirits, walking on water, multiplying loaves and fishes, food falling from the sky, conception by a ghost, people raised from the dead, the sun stopping in its tracks, parting seas, people being bodily sucked up into heaven (which, by the way, lies on the 'other side' of the sky), world-wide flood that drowned the earth to a depth of 40 feet above the tallest mountain, creating people from a dust bunny and a rib, a magical tree of knowledge, god speaking from a burning bush... and ritual cannibalism, by eating god in the form of a cracker.

In a sane world, anybody running around spouting ANY of that crap, would be locked up in the State Farm for the Funny. Apparently, though, mass insanity seems to convey some sort of free pass for the loony.

It offends me to know that in our society, irrational, deluded people who ACTUALLY BELIEVE such nonsense is TRUE are permitted to vote, hold public office, procreate, and shape the minds trusting, vulnerable children.

And people like you say that there's something wrong with people who DON'T belive all this ridiculous crap. Get a grip.

*************

"When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called Religion." ~ Robert M. Pirsig

Answer 8

Ya.

A not equals to B if you change what B is.

You are a stupid person with a useless argument.

Religion is flawed and your defence of it borders on the insane.

http://flushaholybook.com

Answer 9

Man I wish all the religious types out there were as stupid as you are. Eliminating religion would be SOOOOO easy....keep up the good work, Einstein

Answer 10

Really, wouldn't your efforts be better spent improving your own life? You are not going to convert anyone here, especially not with this drivel!

Answer 11

You're getting it confused. The ones that usually believe something blindly are usually religious.

Look, leave everyone to their own beliefs. Respect my beliefs and I'll allow you to keep yours.

Deal?