1 + 1 doesn't equal 2. I can prove it with Science! / when do you think?

Question

Logic would tell you 1 + 1 = 2 . Right?

Well...It has been proven that 1+1 in some cases can be equivalent to 3.

See: In 1 + 1 you can take away the horizontal line on the plus sign and their is 3 different ones!!!

And everyone knows that 3 of the integer 1 is 3!!! But that's not it! If you don't believe that 1 + 1= 3 then the horizontal line we took away from the plus sign will wack you repeatedly on the head and cause you great pain in the hands of an invisible man..!


This about equivalent to some of the 'provings' of the bible I have heard christians preach to people but it is just dressed up in the costume of something no1 knows the answer to: what happens after death. Sadly, that condition can make some people believe it.... :(. Hopefully some day the earth will heal of this kind of logic but I doubt it is close at hand...When do you think this type of logic will die?

OF COURSE YOU CAN'T TAKE AWAY THE HORIZONTAL LINE!!! That is my whole point..just as you can't rise from the dead, or wave a magical finger and create the world....!!!??/

OMFG!!! WHAT A JOKE!!! THIS IS NOT MY ARGUMENT!!! OF COURSE 1 + 1 DOESN'T EAQUAL 2!!!! YOU ARE TOO F'ING STUPID TOO SEE THE PHILOSIPHICAL-RELIGOUS LINK THE SCREWED UP MATH PROBLEM...wow, if people are that slow i can't show them anything..they can just go on living their lives and get their wonderful heaven when they die..

Answer 1

SURE

Answer 2

In some math 1 + 1 = 10 and also the surreal numbers are a whole new world...You have nothing to prove here move along.

Answer 3

1+1= 11 too
1male+1 female= 1 baby so 1+1=3
or if twins 1 female + 1 male=2 babies so 1+1=4

Answer 4

Your crippled logic didn't prove anything. One object plus another object proves there are two objects.

Tell you what, since you don't want to believe that there is life after death, I guess you will just have to find out when you die. I hope you have time to ask God for forgiveness before you draw your last breath, your life can be snuffed out in an instant.

9/11: PERFECT EXAMPLE

Answer 5

scythian is on the mark right here: the valuable integers are carefully built utilising Peano's axioms, and a million+a million is the instant successor of a million, that's defined as 2. yet i could completely disagree with scythian's argument that Godel's Incompleteness Theorems are debatable; the only mathematicians that heavily sense this way are fringe logicians and maniacal set theorists. Godel's theorems unfold out alot of latest venues in arithmetic, and a few might say "freed" us from the fantastically much specific rigorous death to which we've been headed. surely, Hilbert in 1900 asked "ought to somebody please set up a gadget of axioms that's carefully consistent and serves as a foundation for all math?", to which Godel spoke back, countless years later, "no, no you could actually; any axiomatic gadget describing the integers might have specific unprovable statements, and a few that are consistent while taken care of the two as actual and as fake." To summarize: a million+a million is two with the aid of fact it rather is defined that way, axiomatically, and subsequently can not be shown decrease than the conventional gadget of Peano's axioms. Steve EDIT - Above, as quickly as I say "unprovable statements", I propose statements taken care of as actual, yet no longer proved as such (no longer which contains axioms). as quickly as I talk some fact being "consistent while taken care of the two as actual and as fake", I propose autonomous of the present axiomatic framework; this is comparable to asserting the framework can not teach its very own consistency.

Answer 6

Could you elaborate and site some of these "provings" of the Bible that are "dressed up in costumes"? Otherwise your rant is without foundation.
There are no contradictions in Scripture. Find ONE.

Answer 7

I pity you for thinking that way. u cant take away the horizontal line, but anyway if u want a conversation on the way chirstians think email me at [e-mail]

Answer 8

I have no quarrel with your choice of target at which to aim, but the ammunition is bad. There are plenty of more direct ways to attack religious beliefs if you wish to do so. It will serve in the first instance to ask any believer to prove that his/her beliefs are correct; in no case is it possible to do so. On the other hand, you can offer scientific evidence that such beliefs are erroneous; they will not accept such evidence (because they are stupid), but that should not deter you from offering them.

Answer 9

So long as people believe in the bible than we will have this kind of logic in our universe. In time science will rule all we will prove the existence of life on other planets. we shall prevail!!!

Answer 10

Hmmm intresting

Answer 11

Ummmmm. Yeah OK