You can believe in both. I think you're just trying to stir some crap instead of good theological debate. That's the problem with this site.
2006-09-12 07:38:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I don't agree with your premise that you have to only believe in one or the other. Scientists only use the word "Theory" when an idea has not been legitimately disproven by an alternative. There have been too many discoveries not to believe that evolution is true. But at the same time, who says the changes were random? They could have been guided by God. Who says God was limited to 7 Earth days, when He created the entire Universe? A day could have been the time it takes for the galaxy to turn, not just little old Earth. And who says we were His first draft? Most artists I know of are never happy with their first attempt--they work on it until they are satisfied. The ones we have evolved from, and the ones we are distant relatives of, could just be rough drafts He decided not to use!
2006-09-12 14:44:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by cross-stitch kelly 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
This answer I feel is two fold. The first part I feel is that the human race did indeed evolve from the apes but not for the reasons that is generally believed.
God was actually from another race in the universe who had visited earth thousands of years ago and created man through biological seeding.
That is, taking DNA from their race (God in his own image, sound familiar does it not) and planting this into apes. It is a well known fact that humans have 98% of the DNA of apes but where did the other 2% come from. Sorry, not from evolution but from artificial creation.
And no, our own nerds are still to stupid to do this. Give them time though.
2006-09-12 14:48:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Randy P 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Give me some data and a theorem on the existence of God and get back to me. Then we'll talk. At least evolution is coherent enough to offer you something to test. God is irrefutable. Its existence cannot be proved or unproved. You cannot win the debate if your side doesn't have a defensible argument to offer...and no, "Look, it says so in this old book of myths I found!" is not a defensible argument.
2006-09-12 15:16:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mark M 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Few people understand that faith and science are not incompatible. They just need to be kept in their separate boxes. Remember, Christians once believed that the sun revolved around the earth, and that lightning was a demonstration of God's wrath. Science has since debunked these claims, and there are many people of faith who accept these scientific explanations.
Now you must ask yourself, is your inablity to accept scientific rationalizations because they are simply "untrue", or is it a facet of your insecurity in your beliefs?
2006-09-12 14:42:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Well then bow down and worship me buddy cause I believe in evolution
2006-09-12 14:42:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by ηιgнт ѕтαя 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
I beleive in both. I believe the humans God put on Earth a long time ago have evolved through the years. There is no reason why we could not have changed a little. The bible simply does not explain everything to us. If What's his name lived 900 years why can;t we believe our human form changed a little?
2006-09-12 14:40:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
You can believe in evolution and a god. People do.
I'm an Agnostic, so I believe there may be a creator, but I do believe in evolution.
2006-09-12 14:42:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Girl Wonder 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Those "nerds" are much more reliable than your god. At least we can question and test what the "nerds" say without fear of persecution. How can you test the myth that your invisible sky daddy did everything?
2006-09-12 15:05:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do believe because a simple seed becomes a 100 feet tree
2006-09-12 14:40:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋