Enron, WMD in Iraq, Bin laden and Saddam Hussein, no knowledge of 911, missiles to Israel, selling poisonous gas to Saddam.
2006-09-12 06:24:37 · 34 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Bush did not lie about 911 it looks like a demolition because the building was built so uniquely.
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html
2006-09-12 09:20:25 · update #1
Maybe.
2006-09-12 06:27:18 · answer #1 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Ok...
Enron - NOT related to 9/11 - a corporate scandal, but had nothing to do with 9/11
WMD in Iraq - maybe, but ultimately does not matter as authority to invade Iraq came from a UN security directive so more than the USA was involved the invasion
Bin Laden - clearly related to Al Queda as he is the HEAD of it!
Saddam Hussein - a murderous tyrant dictator who tortured and killed at least 300,000 of his own people at his will
Bin Laden/Saddam Hussein link - well, we know there was no link now, don't we? The Senate said so, and it is more than half Republican (but at the time did we really know? - it doesn't matter - see UN security enforcement directive above)
No (prior?) knowledge of 9/11 - he knew when he was told in a Florida classroom ( http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html )
Missiles to Israel - like that's a secret? The US supports Israel as an ally and sells them arms - this is NO secret
Selling poisonus gas to Saddam - didn't he get it from the Germans? We knew about it, but at the time Iraq was at war with Iran and the US was supporting Iraq to keep them from expanding their fundamentalist Islamic regime that took Iran back about 500 years in societal culture (and aren't you glad they - Iraq - did?)
BTW: I'm a DEMOCRAT - not a neocon -- FACTS are what counts in the REAL world - you need to learn what they are! I'll bet the conservatives are figuratively patting me on the back right now, but... FACTS ARE FACTS!
To "Greg" above: NO buildings have collapsed because of fires or plane crashes? FALSE - ask a firefighter if a building has ever collapsed because of a fire - they KNOW. And if you had a 300 ton load to building at 500 miles per hour with thousands of gallons of burning jet fuel to weaken the steel do you think that just MIGHT mess with the structural integrity of the building? Get a clue!!!
2006-09-12 07:09:47 · answer #2 · answered by Paul H 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I must fail to put 2 and 2 together, but what exactly does Enron have to do with some towel heads running planes into the twin towers? Are people like you from another planet? I hope you aren't one of those loonies that think the pentagon was hit by a cruise missile ordered by the president. Get a freaking life.
2006-09-12 07:21:13 · answer #3 · answered by Phil My Crack In 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think alot of people were misinformed and lied.
First you need to start the blame game at Reagans feet. He left the Afghans high and dry after we helped them beat Russia, this pissed off Bin laden who fought in the war.
Then from everyone down, things were missed. I watched the path to 9/11 and have read alot of reports and all I can say is this friends, SO MANY people failed us, remember the president has to rely on what his aides, and people around him are telling him OR NOT telling him.
At one point some members of the FBI were begging the head of the FBI to do something about Laden, they were stonewalled at every turn. THEIR were people who were trying to stop what was going to happen BUT no one wanted to be responsible in taking action except those who were stonewalled.
I think Bush had some really ignorant people giving him information and hiding what info they did have. I dont like Bush BUT YOU cannot fault him for all of THIS when before him Laden was offered to clinton several times but he was busy trying to cover his *** too for his affair.
The president has to rely on those getting the info and processing it and for those who kept saying we need more proof, I hope 9/11 to them was enough proof
2006-09-12 06:31:49 · answer #4 · answered by wilowdreams 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No other building has fallen because of a fire or a plane crash. A building in some other country burned for 24 hours without falling down, and you believe 1 plane took down 1 tower? That's bull. The government did know it was going to happen and they wanted to collect insurance money from the building, the owner of the towers claimed less then half of it. The other half noone knows.
2006-09-12 06:37:53 · answer #5 · answered by Greg 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No he didn't lie. He was given some intellegence and he got his info from that.
Someone of here is blaming Ronald Reagan, OMG...how low can you go? And you want to talk about how Repubs. blame everything on Bubba Clinton....wow what a stretch!
2006-09-12 08:30:02 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Name one lie!!!!
WMD --- FOUND EM
Bin Laden --- Hung out with Saddam's men
Saddam -- In Jail
Enron --- What in the hell does that have to do with 911?
No knowledge of 911 --- He found out as you did
Missiles to Israel --- Gave em to em
Poisonous Gas --- Make believe fantasy
2006-09-12 06:31:25 · answer #7 · answered by Are_You_Stupid? 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
The conspiracy theories out there about 9/11 would require hundreds of people to keep the same secret. Think about that.
2006-09-12 06:28:53 · answer #8 · answered by stklotto 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I have a better question... How many think Fred F is an idiot?
Maybe you should spread your filth in another country, like Tajikistan... they would love to persecute you there. See if you might have a voice there. liberal terrorist traitor!
2006-09-12 07:25:54 · answer #9 · answered by Fulf 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Read reports release by Clinton et al. and the democrats were saying the same thing as Bush. He has weapons, he has used them.
2006-09-12 06:29:19 · answer #10 · answered by Charles B 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They knew beforehand and let it happen in order to justify their war for oil and to scare Americans enough to take away their civil liberties.
2006-09-12 07:31:08 · answer #11 · answered by Mark 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋