2006-09-12 05:35:49 · 26 answers · asked by Proud Indian 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
killing the infidels probably wasn't on his list of things to do....so from the two I think he would go with Christ.
2006-09-12 05:38:09 · answer #1 · answered by rainsparrow 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Mahatma Ghandi would support both. He was a strong Hindu and nothing could have moved him from his Dharma. However, Ghandiji said that he would open the windows of his home to allow breeze to blow in from all different directions, but he will not be blown off his feet. By this he meant that he is open to the teachings of all religions but will forever remain a Hindu. I think he saw all religions as leading to the same goal although the pathways may be different.
2006-09-12 05:46:45 · answer #2 · answered by Hema 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Have you ever heard of the quote by Gandhi ---" I like your Christ. I don't like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ."
I'm a Christian - and I'm not offended by this statement. It can be true. But we all make mistakes. Living up to Christ's perfection is not an easy thing to do, and I don't think I'll ever get to the point where I say - I've got it! Lucky for us all - God's mercy and forgiveness are absolutely free through faith in Christ. what an amazing gift...
2006-09-12 05:43:40 · answer #3 · answered by j-Z 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He spoke well on both. This is what he said about Prophet Mohammed:
I wanted to know the best of one who holds today undisputed sway over the hearts of millions of mankind ... I became more than convinced that it was not the sword that won a place for Islam in those days in the scheme of life. It was the rigid simplicity, the utter self-effacement of the Prophet, the scrupulous regard for his pledges, his intense devotion to his friends and followers, his intrepidity, his fearlessness, his absolute trust in God and in his own mission. These and not the sword carried everything before them and surmounted every obstacle. When I closed the 2nd volume (of the prophet's biography), I was sorry there was not more for me to read of the great life. "
Mahatma Gandhi
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-Islamic_views_of_Muhammad#Mahatma_Gandhi
2006-09-12 05:43:42 · answer #4 · answered by gsumayya 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What do you mean by "support"??? Bizarre question.
Mahatma Ghandi was a secular Hindu. He was involved in the events that led to the separation of Muslim Pakistan from the rest of Hindu India. He was assassinated by an extremist Hindu (not a Muslim as some others below contend) because he supported a payment to Pakistan. He spoke of tolerance for all races, religions and creeds.
I would predict neither if I have to answer your stupid question.
2006-09-12 05:37:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
As has been stated, 'Christ' capacity 'Messiah'. it really is shown at John a million:40-one the position it reads: "First this one discovered his personal brother, Simon, and stated to him: “we've discovered the Mes·si?ah” (meaning, even as translated, Christ)." Jesus grew to develop into the Christ even as he develop into anointed by employing his Heavenly Father upon his baptism by employing John the baptist. [Matthew 3:16,17; Mark a million:9-eleven; Luke 3:21-23; John a million:32-34] those scriptures, even as not fairly stating it, are the gospel debts of ways or perhaps as Jesus grew to develop into the Christ. As Yiannis said, "God delivers a redeemer (Jesus Christ) as some distance again contained in the former testomony as Genesis 3:15", the first actual prophecy recorded contained in the Bible. in case you examine Daniel 9:25,26, you'll see the prophecy there about even as the Messiah might want to look. It informs us: "and also you want to renowned and function the perception [that] from the going forth of [the] word to restoration and to rebuild Jerusalem till Mes·si?ah [the] chief, there'll be seven weeks, also sixty-2 weeks. she will be in a position to go back and be easily rebuilt, with a public sq. and moat, yet contained in the straits of the circumstances. “And after the sixty-2 weeks Mes·si?ah will be decrease off, with not something for himself."
2016-11-26 19:48:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jesus was a pacifist like Ghandi. Mohammed not so much. But Ghandi wounldn't support either of the respected faithful.
2006-09-12 05:40:07 · answer #7 · answered by curtaincaller 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well ghandhi was Hindu wasn’t he…and prophet Muhammad came for Islam…and Christ came for christinity and ghandi had already chosen his religion to be Hinduism :).i think
2006-09-12 05:39:21 · answer #8 · answered by Fia 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He would support both of them because they were both blessed prophets. may peace and blessings be on them both. So to answer your question..any wise soul would realize that he'd support both since they both had the same exact message to give mankind. The belief in peace, unity, harmony and the worship of ONE GOD.
2006-09-12 05:41:27 · answer #9 · answered by mimi 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He would support neither. He once said "Yes I am a Hindu. And I am a Christian, a Jew, a Buddhist and a Muslim. I am of all religions and of none"
2006-09-12 05:39:16 · answer #10 · answered by Shinkirou Hasukage 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would think he'd support Mohamed. Islam offers a comprehensive agenda for leaders who want to change the world
2006-09-12 05:42:08 · answer #11 · answered by Chevalier 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋