English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-12 04:58:07 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pets Birds

13 answers

None of em,I did

2006-09-12 05:00:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Neither, because a chicken (as we know it today) slowly evolved from previous life, and it's eggs follwed suit.

There is no first, because the line between Chickens and it's genetic ancestors is not that distinct, since species are defined by the ability to procreate. Also, today's chickens are very slightly genetically different then chicken's from 1000 years ago and future chickens, so you'd have to define more closely what you mean by chicken.

2006-09-12 06:54:58 · answer #2 · answered by One Tuff piece of Schist 3 · 0 0

The Chicken.

2006-09-12 06:17:14 · answer #3 · answered by John G 5 · 0 0

The chicken came first

2006-09-12 05:05:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Egg. Dinosaurs and Prehistoric Fish were laying eggs long before chickens were even here. Mystery solved. You can all go home.

2006-09-12 05:04:41 · answer #5 · answered by cjh1221 2 · 0 0

I believe that the chicken came first, when you think about it God gave us living things like Cows, Sheep and Humans who get together and make their off springs

2006-09-12 06:24:45 · answer #6 · answered by paula w 1 · 0 1

the chicken faked an orgasm so didn't actually come. Therefore it has to be the egg.

2006-09-12 05:00:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The Chicken of course. Then next came the rooster. They had an egg after that. DUH!

2006-09-12 05:04:14 · answer #8 · answered by yweouch 3 · 0 0

NOT AGAIN !
2 points

2006-09-12 08:43:23 · answer #9 · answered by Spanner 6 · 0 0

errrrmmmmmm.....

thanks for the 2 points!

2006-09-12 08:51:45 · answer #10 · answered by ♣♥BabyBlue♥♣ 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers