English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A lot of people think this is a ploy of the Republican Party to deny some people the chance.....poor, elderly, etc. Personally, I think everyone should have an ID....whether they drive or not just to prove who they are (even when not voting).

2006-09-12 01:28:49 · 16 answers · asked by crale70 3 in Politics & Government Civic Participation

16 answers

I don't have a problem with presenting ID. I do, however, have a major problem with electronic voting machines that have no paper trail. I am a registered Independent and I want every eligible voter's vote to count, period.

2006-09-12 01:35:38 · answer #1 · answered by yahell sucks! 2 · 13 1

properly, i'm a Democrat and the final element i want is a collection of "ineffective Republicans" vote casting. I completely help the photograph identity element and that i've got continuously concept it replaced into extraordinary which you do no longer ought to teach identity (my polling place does not even ask on your voter registration card, basically your call!) I do think of that a state identity card do not have a value linked with it; in my state it rather is $15. For me, this isn't something yet no person ought to ought to come to a decision on between feeding their youngster and getting a image identity so they might exercising their Constitutional rights. The editorial author has a factor there... no longer that undesirable minorities are stupid and lazy, yet that undesirable people have rights, too and it ought to no longer be a remember of laziness that keeps somebody from acquiring an identity.

2016-11-07 04:05:57 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The Republican party has a long History of efforts to stop people from voting, they even tried a literacy test once and that failed.
They tried poll taxes and that failed.
Republicans know that when many people vote they lose. They are the minority party in pure numbers. They remain the majority party only by cash spent to win elections and dirty tricks.
The market for fake IDs has went up since this was passed.
According to R.F. Kennedy Jr. in Ohio in 2004, a full 357,000 votes were not counted, thrown out by Republican operatives. Bush was awarded the State by 118, 601 votes. It was the Conservative bias High court that ruled against States rights and for awarding Ohio to Bush in 2004. That is fact. Most of the 357,000 votes that were not counted were for John Kerry.

2006-09-12 04:07:56 · answer #3 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 6 1

How else can you tell whether or not some person is a legal member of your country? Just asking is not the answer since every illegal person will naturally answer you with a "Yes, I am".

By the way, it can also be a ploy of the Democrat Party since both have an interest in keeping the other party from gaining winning votes.

In most communities, someone working at the voting place actually knows the person who wants a ballot. In large cities, it may be necessary to show some legal ID.

2006-09-15 16:25:43 · answer #4 · answered by Mr.Been there 3 · 0 5

That Makes no sense. The elderly are the strongest voting body in the country, and many of them are conservative. And the right to vote is a constitutionally protected right, if anyone's ability to vote was abridged by anyone, you'd see the media pounce on it like fresh meat.

But I strongly dislike your idea of IDs for everyone. It sounds too orwellian for my taste. The government has no business asking me for identification unless i'm driving, or voting. This is not a police state.

2006-09-12 01:34:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

I feel that every voter should be required to provide ID.
Because of the times that we live in, it is more important now than ever to know who is using our system, and who is abusing our system.
And for the people that think ID's are Orwellian ideas, then why are you OK with being required to use your ID every time you log on to YA? Seems to me like you just use the Orwellian factor as a crutch to prop up your paranoia.
ID's are required for every other aspect of life in the United States, why not use ID's to protect our most fundamental right as US citizens, the right to vote?
Why is it that I am required to be registered to vote, and be required by my state to produce ID, but other states do not have that requirement? Seems biased if you ask me.
The Republican party, most certainly would not try to deny people the chance to vote. I have heard on this forum that" When you are young, you are liberal, and when you get older, you tend to be more conservative. If that is true, wouldn't the Republicans want the older, more conservative voters, to have the ability to cast a ballot?
The only people who think that the Republicans would want to deny anybody their right to vote, would be the democrats. The liberals will say anything to make the conservatives look bad. Proof in point is the fact that the Democrats are accusing the President of politicizing 9/11 in his speech to the Nation last night. What was the man supposed to talk about, considering that he spent the previous two days visiting the sites of the 9/11 attacks, and that the rest of the country was remembering the attacks also. Was he supposed to talk about stem-cell research. gay marriage, abortion, national health care? He was focused on the attacks and the aftermath of that tragic day. Of course, anytime a politician speaks, it's political, that is what they do!
For the Democrats to pile on and beat up the president over that speach is disgusting, immature, and hateful. Especially when it comes out of the mouth of that ***** Hillary Clinton. That is one reason why Democrats will never get a vote from me, ever!

2006-09-12 04:46:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 7

People have birth certificates, id's etc. It is very rare that someone doesn't and voter registration will work with people to get them ready to vote.

I'm all for it, I don't want some illegal voting. It's bad enough we have to pay higher auto insurance for the uninsured motorists claims they cause. I'm not about to let them vote on our policies or leaders and neither should anyone else.

2006-09-12 01:36:15 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 1 4

I've always been shocked that they never asked for ID. That is the silliest thing I could envision that they would try to compare my signature from 9 years ago, it has changed considerably since I first registered to vote.

Showing ID is a natural way to cut down on voter fraud and keep those dead people from voting every year.

One initiative that has been kicking around since reagan but was being championed by Clinton was a national ID card. Why after 9/11 that wasn't part of the Homeland Security initiative I'll never know. Instead all the states were required to put in their own enhanced ID drivers licenses that were not all approved by the the HSA.

Most likely the NID was not pushed because of resistance from pro-illegal immigration groups, like Tyson Farms, who would suffer if the NID was required to obtain legal employment. But not requiring ID to vote is only asking for fraud at the polls.

2006-09-12 02:03:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 7

It should be required. If you don't drive or don't want to show your driver's licence, then just get a state photo ID. They are not that hard to get. I have a driver's licence and a state ID.

2006-09-12 01:38:38 · answer #9 · answered by JSalakar 5 · 0 3

I think an ID should be required. Voting is important, and there should be no appearance of impropriety.

2006-09-12 01:38:46 · answer #10 · answered by barter256 4 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers