we will win, we will win, we will win, we will win.
2006-09-11 21:11:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
true they are aging....but its even more true that old is gold..however old mcgrath might be...there is no one better than him in the current cricket world....and well well..ponting n gilchrist can rip any bowling attack apart at this age easily....warne looks fit enough 2 play 2 more years...and dont call the big man mathew hayden that he is aged...i cant see england winning the ashes....not at all....and by the way what on earth is the hair cut 2 do with winning? shoaib akhtar is still bowling good with his ugly looking new hair cut....!!
Though Australian players are aged, they have the fighting spirit and stamina and plays consistently well. That is the reason they are rated as 1st team in the world as of now. They are also in the process of beinging up youngsters. M. Clarke is an example. He is a very promising player. Hussey is another upcoming player and they have no dearth of talent.
2006-09-12 00:04:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by khan 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Australia will be desperate to get the Ashes back and I suspect they will probably do so. I just hope England give a good account of themselves and if the games are as good as the last Ashes series we are in for a treat.
2006-09-14 14:26:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by david c 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
true they are aging....but its even more true that old is gold..however old mcgrath might be...there is no one better than him in the current cricket world....and well well..ponting n gilchrist can rip any bowling attack apart at this age easily....warne looks fit enough 2 play 2 more years...and dont call the big man mathew hayden that he is aged...i cant see england winning the ashes....not at all....and by the way what on earth is the hair cut 2 do with winning? shoaib akhtar is still bowling good with his ugly looking new hair cut....!!
2006-09-12 00:05:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Though Australian players are aged, they have the fighting spirit and stamina and plays consistently well. That is the reason they are rated as 1st team in the world as of now. They are also in the process of beinging up youngsters. M. Clarke is an example. He is a very promising player. Hussey is another upcoming player and they have no dearth of talent.
2006-09-11 23:20:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by vakayil k 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
true they are aging....but its even more true that old is gold..however old mcgrath might be...there is no one better than him in the current cricket world....and well well..ponting n gilchrist can rip any bowling attack apart at this age easily....warne looks fit enough 2 play 2 more years...and dont call the big man mathew hayden that he is aged...i cant see england winning the ashes....not at all....and by the way what on earth is the hair cut 2 do with winning? shoaib akhtar is still bowling good with his ugly looking new hair cut....!!
2006-09-11 22:24:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Zuhair-from-pakistan 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Pointing Aussies
wat is the position or future cricket of england ??????????????
ans is nothing nothing nothing nothing
remember one thing
aussies are playing with aged cricketer for years and won 3 world cups and many cups
but england hasnt won one world cup and hasnt suceeded in past, present and in this to be in future too..
2006-09-12 13:40:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
they r going to win back Ashes
2006-09-12 18:23:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by john 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
when their opponent proves not to b gr8, it is not that much difficult for the Kangaroos to win it....
may b the aged kangaroos r enough for winning against their ashes rivals....
2006-09-12 03:54:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by jason 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
becz they are having the spirit which the team india didn't have.
2006-09-15 01:17:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by chiru r 2
·
0⤊
0⤋