English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What about peircings?

2006-09-11 20:59:55 · 20 answers · asked by timberleigh 4 in Beauty & Style Skin & Body

WTF is a chav?
I realise that everyone is entitled to their own opinions.. but if youre going to be an a$s ..dont bother to answer.

2006-09-11 21:20:26 · update #1

Im not wanting to get a tattoo now.. I realise that I have to wait.. no biggie.. Im just wondering why it is not recommended.

2006-09-12 10:16:30 · update #2

I asked 2 tattoo artists. 10 yrs ago one told me women shouldnt get tatts when they are pregnant because of the body changes distorting it and not letting it heal properly.
Another tattoo artist told me in january.. that it was unsafe for pregnant women because it could put the fetus into shock.

2006-09-14 08:35:44 · update #3

20 answers

Well, I've read in some studies that the inks used in tattoos have traces of metal in them, like mercury. I don't remember what else the study said was found in them, but lots of bad stuff that would make no one want a tattoo.
I don't know of any reasons not to get peircings though.

2006-09-11 21:28:36 · answer #1 · answered by waiting 2 · 0 0

Blah don't listen to the folks who are like 'the ink is poisonous' or something - but they have the right notion - you should not get a tattoo at the same time pregnant, and tattoo artists is not going to knowingly tattoo a pregnant woman. Not given that the ink is poisonous - if the ink is poisonous then nobody would get tattoos lol seeing that they'd kill us, that's pretty dumb. But - when you get a tattoo it includes with it the small hazard of infection, mostly consequently of unhealthy aftercare. Your chance of contamination isn't any bigger when you are pregnant than when you are no longer, however within the unlikely occasion that you DO get an infection, this may influence the unborn little one. So you're comfortably passing to your own small risk to your child - and of path any respectable mum or dad or mother or father-to-be wishes to get rid of even the smallest of dangers to their youngsters, exceptionally when it is accordingly of some thing so uneccessary as a tattoo (when it will be very effortless to wait a number of months). For the identical cause, you must now not get a tattoo whilst you are breastfeeding, because infections can also be handed by way of to the breastfeeding youngster (and breastfeeding must no longer be stopped early in an effort to have a tattoo too!). Any respectable tattoo artist is not going to tattoo a pregnant or breastfeeding girl. And any first rate mother would no longer get a tattoo whilst pregnant or breastfeeding. So wait. Edit: And the persons who say you can get a tattoo a long as it is in a situation far from the child are morons. Severely - did these persons go to institution? The place is the logic in that? The ink is injected into your dermis, which is the layer of dermis under your epidermis. So if a pregnant girl had a tattoo on her belly the ink wouldn't get into the foetus or anyplace close! Nor into your bloodstream either - ink isn't injected into your veins! Jeez - I fear about the intelligence of this iteration! The threat of illness is present whether or not you get a foot tattoo or a belly tattoo and an contamination in either position would have simply as quality an influence on the unborn little one. Edit once more: I expect my thumbs down is from one of the stated morons, due to the fact my reply is 100% correct. This is coming from anyone with a variety of tattoos, who can also be a mom, and knows loads about each areas. The only factor I did not make is shygirl's factor - which can be proper - there's a very small chance that the shock can purpose miscarriage or early labour (similar to how ladies who have a fall or are in a moderate car crash and are unhurt can almost always have miscarriages or premature births, considering the physique goes into shock). Any person stated that some tattooists understand that the hazard is handiest very small, like this makes it k? I presume she isn't a mother. An actual mom would not let ANY unneccessary danger come to her little one, even essentially the most minute of dangers. To try this for the sake of getting a tattoo just a few months earlier is unwell. When you are not able to put your baby earlier than your own wants now, when will you ever be equipped to?

2016-08-09 14:15:36 · answer #2 · answered by harting 4 · 0 0

Blah do not pay attention to the folks who're like 'the ink is poisonous' or anything - however they have got the proper suggestion - you should not get a tattoo even as pregnant, and tattoo artists won't knowingly tattoo a pregnant lady. NOT considering the fact that the ink is poisonous - if the ink is poisonous then NOBODY could get tattoos lol considering the fact that they could kill us, that is beautiful dumb. But - whilst you get a tattoo it includes with it the small danger of illness, in general for this reason of unhealthy aftercare. Your danger of illness isn't any better while you're pregnant than while you are no longer, however within the not going occasion that you just DO get an illness, this will impact the unborn little one. So you're without difficulty passing to your possess small danger for your little one - and of path any first rate mother or father or mother or father-to-be desires to do away with even the smallest of dangers to their youngsters, peculiarly while it is for this reason of anything so uneccessary as a tattoo (while it could be very convenient to attend a couple of months). For the identical rationale, you must no longer get a tattoo even as you're breastfeeding, considering the fact that infections can also be handed by way of to the breastfeeding little one (and breastfeeding must no longer be stopped early to be able to have a tattoo quicker too!). Any first rate tattoo artist won't tattoo a pregnant or breastfeeding lady. And any first rate mom could no longer get a tattoo even as pregnant or breastfeeding. So wait. Edit: And the folks who say you'll be able to get a tattoo a protracted as it is in a location clear of the little one are morons. Seriously - did those folks pass to university? Where is the common sense in that? The ink is injected into your epidermis, that's the layer of epidermis beneath your skin. So if a pregnant lady had a tattoo on her belly the ink would not get into the foetus or at any place near! Nor into your bloodstream both - ink isn't injected into your veins! Jeez - I fear approximately the intelligence of this iteration! The danger of illness is gift whether or not you get a foot tattoo or a belly tattoo and an illness in both location could have simply as high-quality an final result at the unborn little one. Edit once more: I expect my thumbs down is from probably the most stated morons, considering the fact that my reply is one hundred% right. This is coming from anybody with plenty of tattoos, who could also be a mom, and is aware of plenty approximately each locations. The handiest factor I didn't make is shygirl's factor - which could also be right - there's a very small risk that the surprise can reason miscarriage or early labour (very similar to how females who've a fall or are in a moderate automobile crash and are unharmed can generally have miscarriages or untimely births, considering the fact that the frame is going into surprise). Someone stated that a few tattooists understand that the danger is handiest very small, like this makes it ok? I presume she isn't a mom. A truly mom does not permit ANY unneccessary danger come to her little one, even essentially the most minute of dangers. To do this for the sake of having a tattoo a couple of months prior is ill. If you can not placed your little one earlier than your possess demands now, while will you ever be in a position to?

2016-08-21 07:30:24 · answer #3 · answered by shiva 4 · 0 0

Chav?? hahaaaa did she just make that up? Awww, I wanna do it...um...you might look like a sloosh. Oh, no! What ever will you do? Let that crap go in one ear and right out the other....cuz their ignorance shows. Geez. But, as for your question, last time I was pregnant, I wondered this myself b/c my best friend and I wanted to get a tattoo during that time. I never did get it--but that was for other reasons--I have 2 now.

I think tattooing is like hair dying and tanning beds, as far as pregnancy is concerned. They haven't done enough research to make a medical opinion, and what studies they have done have shown inconclusive results, so they can't make a medical standpoint on the subjects. They won't advocate it though, just b/c it 'sounds' bad for a doctor to tell you that it's really not going to hurt your child for you to dye your hair or get a tattoo while pregnant.

Obviously, b/c you might be a chav. Haha....or a sloosh even. I like my word better. There's not really a reason not to--other than the already known risk of getting a tattoo--just remember that there hasn't been significant research, and there'll always be time later.

2006-09-11 22:10:32 · answer #4 · answered by Cy 5 · 0 0

There aren't any more beneficial hazards to getting a tattoo even as pregnant, even if if an infection ought to ensue, there would nicely be severe outcomes for the mum and toddler. No artists will contact a pregnant or breastfeeding lady, because if something is going incorrect in any respect, it would nicely be devastating, or maybe deadly. So yeah, that's no more beneficial risky interior the sense of ink entering into the toddler's blood, or actual damage to the fetus. that's merely that the conventional hazards of tattoos are a concepts more beneficial risky than they'd be for each body who wasn't pregnant.

2016-10-16 00:16:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Infertility can be caused by a huge number of factors: hormone imbalance, Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome, Endometriosis, Anovulatory Cycles, physical blockage, inadequate hormone production, short luteal phase, lack of lutenizing hormone, high levels or prolactin, and many others. How to get pregnant https://tr.im/2k7q6

Poor nutrition often plays a major role, as does exposure to toxins. Age plays less of a role before menopause than was originally thought. While there are many wonderful naturally minded fertility specialists out there, in many cases it is not possible for them to test for and address any of these possible underlying issues.

2016-02-08 20:08:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What the he** is a Chav?...anyway....I would imagine for the same reasons your not suppose to color your hair. What ever enters the bloodstream goes into the baby's bloodstream as well, because that is where it gets everything from, the mother!...wait till after and then do what you want concerning a tatoo, 9 mos isn't long to wait, tatoo artists aren't closing shop in 9 mos......

2006-09-11 22:20:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Pregnant women should not! Because tatoo requires breaking the skin barriers and may carry infection and allergic reactions.

The needles will come in contact with the blood or bodily fluids and disease may be transmitted if the needles will be used by more than 1 person without being sterilized.

Be extra careful especially if one is pregnant, you may harm yourself and the baby as well!

2006-09-11 21:26:38 · answer #8 · answered by Vixen 2 · 0 0

Pregnant women should not get pierced or tattooed because technically it is a form of trauma. And any form of trauma increases the risk of miscarriage during pregnancy. Not to mention the added risk of infection and blood-borne diseases (rare with today's sterilization methods and standards but still very possible).

2006-09-11 22:22:18 · answer #9 · answered by aas_627 4 · 1 0

I believe it's because there is always a risk of getting blood poisoning from piercings and tattoos. That's a risk even if you're not pregnant, but more dangerous if you are, in case the poison affects your baby.

2006-09-11 21:02:31 · answer #10 · answered by Kylie 3 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers