http://www.guardian.co.uk/september11/story/0,,1870427,00.html
2006-09-11 20:50:10 · 13 answers · asked by http://hogshead.pokerknave.com/ 6 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
think you have to be sane to stand trial
2006-09-11 20:52:46 · answer #1 · answered by scottietiger 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Mr Bush said. "The answer is that the regime of Saddam Hussein was a clear threat. ......."
Obviously Saddam has made a mistake by attacking its neighbors. Big powers have long term interest in the region. The question is who is the beneficiary. Bush is probably framing his global policies in view of the reason that America is only global power.
2006-09-12 06:34:26 · answer #2 · answered by snashraf 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Iraqi war was not just about 9/11 - Iraq did possess weapons of mass destruction, as admitted by George Sada (ex no.2 in the Iraq air force). The chemicals in question were flown to Syria in converted passenger planes under the guise of humanitarian aid following a flood.
2006-09-12 03:58:54 · answer #3 · answered by Perkins 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush never, ever say that Saddam was involved with 9/11. That was just retard liberals putting words in his mouth and DNC drones with no mind of their own repeated it as truth.
Why war criminal? AYRTS?
2006-09-12 08:10:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
look i don't give a s**t who is to blame leave it and let the people who have lost there lives ones that day Let them rest in peace.
As for Bush Blair Saddam thy are all power hunters
2006-09-12 04:59:20 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have been indoctrinated against America and Bush by the British left wing TV media, and probably also your teachers/lecturers. Oh God! I have just seen where you got your info from, that left wing rag THE GUARDIAN. You make my point.
2006-09-12 04:58:33 · answer #6 · answered by Veritas 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
9/11 was not the reason Irak was invaded. So I don't see why the connection is made in the 1st place.
2006-09-12 03:52:50 · answer #7 · answered by Walter W. Krijthe 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
not sure really, even tough he has got a bad man off the street as it were is it really up to him who should lead a country and who shouldnt?
2006-09-12 04:24:04 · answer #8 · answered by welshwife 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush and Blair (Bliar)
both
2006-09-12 03:58:15 · answer #9 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I bet you do a lot of channel hopping to get as confused as this
2006-09-12 03:55:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋