I have been watching the History Channel (HC) alot latly, mainly because of 9.11 reenactments. I have noticed many contridictions between their own events retelling which is pretty ignorent of them to begin with, because it initiated my suspicion. Example being in one of their shows it was said that no one could have predicted this tragedy, while in another it was said that one of the security chiefs of the north tower was continiously predicting it (since the 93' bombing) and attempting to prevent it. A couple of my friends have been attempting to get me to look into the 9.11 conspiracy theories, for several months, which advocate that the Gov't is behind the disaster. I always disregarded my friends' opinions even after seeing compelling videos. Shortly after watching the HC i looked into it and noticed official reports that are very significant but were not mentioned in the HC.
-question: Who are the funders, CEO and/or directors of HC and how are they affiliated with the Gov't
2006-09-11 20:08:02 · 6 answers · asked by Misha 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Other - Arts & Humanities
The HC is funded by A&E television which is a joint venture between Hearst, NBC Universal, and ABC.
Finding a government link is worthless considering every large company in the US will have some link to the government probably, and looking for clues to connect a conspiracy theory is easy.
Don't believe all that Loose Change nonsense. There were videos posted of bin Laden admitting he planned it, videos of the hijackers training with him in Afghanistan, and constant claims of responsibility from all of them. Aside from the fact that it would take HUNDREDS of co-conspirators to keep this under wraps, when Bush hasn't been able to get away with ANYTHING since. You can't even get some oral sex in the white house without some internet blogger making it national news.
2006-09-11 20:13:19 · answer #1 · answered by Swarms 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The History Channel obtains documentaries from many sources produced by many people. Those sources will not always agree. Variations can be expected, and do not reflect badly on the people running the channel. In fact, they are performing a service by presenting a range of views so that viewers can make up their own minds.
2006-09-11 20:14:20 · answer #2 · answered by iansand 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would not sound contradictory, more desirable than countless each body is behind diverse exhibits/aspects of a custom, and are offering more desirable or a lot less on diverse aspects of 9/11. Your particular social gathering would not sound like a contradiction both. i assume that the first human being signifies that no one may have envisioned specially that this attack might want to ensue, even as it type of feels that the 2d human being replaced into predicting that there have been structural problems with the construction in case of a bombing that mandatory to be regarded into. those viewpoints are not from now on contradictory. The conspiracy theories circling round 9/11 do no longer look particularily sturdy, and all of those I have considered have had truly truly disprovable factors. In different words, in case you need to trust in a conspiracy idea, picking one with a lot less eyewitnesses and video pictures and sheer quantity of not straightforward evidence of the activities is probably a more desirable proper guess.
2016-11-26 19:17:44 · answer #3 · answered by start 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is more like a tribute to 9/11 and is merely trying to find clues as to why it happened and how to stop it in the future.
2006-09-11 20:16:33 · answer #4 · answered by Pickles 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are Zionists. Zionists are not affiliated with the government, they controll it
2006-09-11 20:17:07 · answer #5 · answered by Crow_Feeder 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
EVERYONE is biased!
2006-09-11 20:10:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋