Do you think that pierce Brosnan "the one who used to play the role of james Bond" is great in his acting?

Answer 1

He was a better Bond than Timothy Dalton (what a stiff). I also liked Brosnan in Matador too.

But are we ready for a female Bond (something like an illigitimate offspring of James. I'd put Rosamund Spike on the list for the role - she played Miranda Frost in Die Another Day).

Answer 2

Great, no. But he can be very good. I recommend an early movie of his, TAFFIN. Filmed in Ireland, he plays an unofficial debt collector, who uses brains and brawn to collect for his clients. He reluctantly fights for his home village against the criminally connected types who want to develop the village. He knows that eventually, he'll be standing alone when the townspeople stop supporting the campaign when the going gets tough. Kind of a Travis McGee flavor; a knight errant, or as Raymond Chandler wrote:

"Down these mean streets a man must go who is not himself mean, who is neither tarnished nor afraid. The detective must be a complete man and a common man and yet an unusual man. He must be, to use a rather weathered phrase, a man of honor. He talks as the man of his age talks, that is, with rude wit, a lively sense of the grotesque, a disgust for sham, and a contempt for pettiness."

Brosnan does a fine job of living up to Chandler's wisdom in TAFFIN.

Answer 3

In terms of acting... he just seems to be reprising the same role over and over again. I don't think I've seen him in his "element" like, just... yet=P
For some reason, he has this look, I can't quite make out if he's in pain or constipated, lol *sorry, but it's true*
As far as the James Bond franchises are... he doesn't hold a candle to Sir Sean Connery, now that's a great A-C-T-O-R.

Answer 4

The Holy Spirit received't mislead you - can't mislead you. besides the undeniable fact that, with the intention to trust contained in the Mysteries of Christianity, that's significant droop reason. that's a completely diverse be counted from self-deception. that's largely attainable to droop your concept in reason if the Holy Spirit delivers your request to take delivery of the present of religion. once you've that, you'd be in a position to settle for concerns that can not be proved with the help of reason - which incorporates bread and wine being switched over into the body and blood of Jesus Christ. this can look confusing to settle for, besides the undeniable fact that that's what Christ suggested to the Apostles. To gray Tower: Your searching can bring about case you keep on with the link lower than. it is acceptable to every person else who owes it to themselves to detect all the evidence even as looking for an suggested moral experience. Unbelievers can mock all they prefer - yet contained in the authentic, it would want to were their determination even if to detect or no longer, and having explored, even if to act or no longer. As for examples, properly, this communicate board is comprehensive of those who've perspectives in accordance with their very own consciences yet who're deceiving themselves spiritually in the adventure that they imagine that they want do no more desirable than position self belief of their very own uninformed thoughts with out searching further.

Answer 5

I can't convince myself that he is a great actor or great in his acting. He just have that charisma that they're looking for a James Bond character.

Answer 6

Yes he has had some super roles & I luved him in them.
The Thomas Crown Affair is #1 in my book.

Answer 7

I was never really a fan until I saw "The Tailor of Panama," in which I thought he was excellent. I also liked him in the more recent "The Matador."

Answer 8

fine to me but not so great...
though he knows how to use his eyes in his acting and that is a rare talent but i think connery is better.

Answer 9

not a fan, but who can live up to sean connery. i did like him in dante's peak

Answer 10

he's really just an "ok" actor..he's definitely no Sean Connery