Are there people here that still believe that communism is a superior economic system to capitalism?

Question

http://capitalism.org/tour/preamble1.htm

http://www.schwarzreport.org/Essays/whyckill.htm

"4. Liquidation of the Bourgeoisie:
The Communists are followers of Karl Marx. They believe that the economic environment generates ideas and character. Their ultimate objective is to create the perfect character through the perfecting environment.

When the revolution is successful, the majority of the bourgeois class remains. In the words of Karl Marx, they must be "swept out of the way and made impossible." If this is not done, they will form the environment in which a substantial segment of the population is nurtured and will thus destroy the prospect of a perfect society.

The liquidation of the bourgeoisie is an essential step of the path to Communism. This is why Communism must kill."

What country has communism flourished and been good for the people?

Answer 1

Depends on what you mean by superior.

If being the best or superior one means developing a country full of individuals that rewards those with the most... the Donald Trumps, etc... where each person is taught to look out for self interest at all cost, then capitalism is.

If being th best or superior one means developing a country where individuals are taught a sense of community first, then communism is.

Answer 2

from an international bankers point of view they work almost exactly the same with communism being somewhat more productive and quick at stripping the wealth from the land than capitolism ... absent a central bank fleecing the population of its wealth a capitolistic society can possibly be universally wealthy but since central banks control practically all the economies of the free world and communist worlds there is no real benefit to either system in practice.

Answer 3

Obviously not the US who is supporting things like giving money to noncontributors like I have met on welfare working under the table or SSI working under the table, dealing drugs, prosituting, etc. I see this as communism for at least the poor because they are rewarded regardless if they contribute to the system in any way at all positive.

Answer 4

first of all, we have not particularly arise with a equipment the place all of us particularly do get to be equivalent, on a great scale. There are some small communities, maximum exceedingly the Amish, who've make real socialism artwork, yet in basic terms on a small scale. They have not gotten finished blown socialism to truly artwork for an entire united states of america yet, or in line with danger a province or state yet. in the event that they'd, that would desire to possibly be incredibly on the threshold of equality. Communism inherently won't be able to create an equivalent society, considering the fact that a undeniable classification of folk get to make each and all the strategies approximately how components get allotted, and who does what activity and who gets what cost for what produce. no longer all human beings gets to make the strategies, in simple terms the social gathering individuals. it may be impossible actual for each guy or woman to make the strategies because of the fact even in a democracy a majority regulations a minority. In organic, real capitalism, the invisible hand makes those judgements. in this style, guy or woman human beings and companies would desire to collaborate to make certain expenses, and output and who does what activity. providers and demanders, in capitalism agree on expenses. you are able to no longer have one without the different, and it is the reason capitalism is extra egalitarian than communism (yet no longer socialism of direction). it is exciting that interior united states of america of america we've aspects of all 3 structures in play. we've socialist policies like social protection and medicare, we've communist style command financial equipment policies like the minimum salary, and different cost placing mechanisms (that's surprising the minimum salary is semi communist because of the fact it is the government requiring a undeniable cost) and maximum manifestly capitalism too. it is form of humorous that we've mandatory aspects of all 3 structures to make our society function. i ask your self what it may be like if we in simple terms dedicated to a minimum of one.

Answer 5

If you could ever have a TRUE communist society, it would be far superior to capitolism. But you can never have a TRUE communist society, so capitolism will always be better.

Answer 6

Of course there are. Every liberal believes it, they just prefer to call it nationalized Health-care, liberalism, social responsibility and a few other thousand names.

Answer 7

no,, that we have a Fascist government here in the US,,, if you don't believe in the Iraq invasion your for terrorism,,, does Bush intend to attack his own people,, or just a slip of the political tongue,,,

Answer 8

I didn't think anyone really though it was economically superior - just morally superior.