Why is it LIBERALS JUST CAN'T GET IT ABOUT SADDAM AND IRAQ? Silly me they're being liberals!?

Question

I always have to educate liberals about the truth that after 9/11 President Bush said: If you harbor a terrorist, sponsor a terrorist, you're a terrorist. Everyone applauded that statement. Saddam is a terrorist because he paid them to go into Israel to kill civilians. This is a fact. Saddam also had wmd's (look it up), used wmd's, violated the u.n. resolutions, was shooting at our planes, was not "contained" like liberals think, had bought the u.n. officials, France, Russia, Germany, and China to rearm while they looked the other way. This is known as the Food for Oil Scandal. So, going into iraq was needed. Saddam also terrorized his neighbors (Kuwait, Iran, and Israel). Saddam terrorized the Kurds by gasing them. Saddam is just as bad as Milosovich and the libs were behind Clinton all the way. Saddam is as bad as Hitler who he admired. To compare Saddam to other leaders won't do because Saddam IS THE ONLY leader to use wmd's. But libs want to pacify him.

wbrian_28 is a coward and a liar or stupid. I was in the Marines during Desert Storm. I never said what he is saying and he needs to take a reading comprehension course to understand what he reads. you really don't even know what patriotism is. How pathetic!

Answer 1

There is an element in this country that does not take the war on terror seriously. call them "liberals," "democrats," "pacifists," or whatever else you please, but they irritate me to no end.

I can't, for the life of me, imagine what the Islamic terrorists have to do to get these people's attention.

These dirt bags would cut your damn head off - just to make another video.

They have made their agenda very clear - they want to kill us and all other infidels in the world. They want a one world government under Islamic Law.

This is not a minor disagreement between friends that requires a little diplomacy, you idiots, this is self preservation time!

And I will personally vote and campaign against any candidate that even hints of a cut and run policy this November and again in 2008!

The terrorists do not deserve any type of victory for their tactics of killing innocent men, women and children around the world. Period.

Answer 2

You sound like Rush Limbaugh on a bad day. And no. it is not meant as a compliment. If Saddam harbored terrorists attacking Israel then why wasn't he Israels challenge? Israel had no worry taking concerns into their very own palms while they bombed Iraq's nuclear facility 2 many years in the past. as a strategies via fact the gassing of the Kurds, we regarded any different way while it befell. Why are we hastily outraged?

Answer 3

"There's no evidence Saddam Hussein had a relationship with Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and his Al Qaeda associates, according to a Senate report on prewar intelligence on Iraq."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,212897,00.html

Make of that what you will. We never found WMD either, we found depleted sarin canisters from the Iraq-Iran war (20 years ago). If you think 20 year old depleted chemicals classify as WMD, well that's on you.

Besides, It was America and other nations that armed Hussein to begin with. Plenty of other dictators have used biochemical weapons in and outside of wars. Hell we used Agent Orange in Nam.

Saddam had WMD back in the 1980s, not in 2003 when we went to war though. Even Bush has since admitted this known fact. The stockpiles of WMD were never found, the search has been called off. This is the conclusion of every single last government investigation into the matter and it is heavily documented.

Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11, again even Bush has said this.

We went to war for no good reason and people are still dying for that mistake.

Answer 4

....sadaam is the only leader PROVEN to use wmd ... saddam didnt take any sh*t from his population so what? There are several regimes and countries left in the world that refuse to give into the "new world order" way of thinking mostly because of religeous beliefs .... these countries will be systematically taken out ... and guess what? The constitution of the United States is another big hurdle for the globalist to overcome ... especially the right to bear arms ... so you can bet your fruit-of-the-looms that the US population is on the new world orders hit list also ... we need to stop worrying about what saddam did, and about fictional "terrorist" figures and tapes, and start worrying about the people that are systematically taking our rights away and installing a system of control right under our noses in this country that will be used against us in the very near future.

Answer 5

this is my answer to a similar question just a minute ago:

I read yesterday that the president authorized a "saturation" of the border of Pakistan and Afghanistan in search of Bin Ladin. Fine that he is doing so, but my point would be that if we were not already at a saturation point in search of Al Queda...why weren't we. I think it is because Iraq has overtaken the search for the terrorists that have declared war on us. If that's not enough reason to never have invaded Iraq, I can think of more, but that is enough in itself. However much I was against the war up to a couple years ago, I believe, as an American, that we must strive to leave Iraq in some semblance of order, because it will embolden our enemies if we leave...which brings me to another reason to never have gone...it puts us in a must win situation in a conflict with no guarantee of success...no matter how hard we try to win, we might fail

Answer 6

Yes, I find it really hard to believe the liberals think there were no wmd in Iraq. I've seen reports on hundreds on things found there buried in the sand.
Clinton did NOTHING to fight terrorism which is what we are dealing with from then til now.

Answer 7

Well in a sense Bush can be a terrorist because he sent "troops" to iraq and how many civilians have been killed there. Only the people present at the speech applauded Bush's your either with us our your with the terrorsit speech, wich is compleatly rediculous. How about, they hate us for our freedom speech he always gives, so lets take away all your freedoms to make the terrorist happy. If we take away our freedoms, and stop using warrents, and limit our freedom of speech, doesnt that mean the terrorist won. Also if we are going to go attack all countries that have WMD's then why not go to attack Korea. We know for a fact that they have WMD's so whats up with that. "Oh well we just dont like Saddam". Yeah I guess so. "he has oil thats why" oh yeah I forgot. So you see how that works. Who cares if he liked hitler. He can like him if he wants. Iraq oppresses its people and women, well North Korea has freakin concentration camps, and they torture people, kill babies in front of thier mothers, do human experiment. People eat each other because there is no food. "But they dont have oil of coarse". We cant just go attacking nations because they dont listen to what we want. who died and made us boss.

HOw about Iran. They are preparing a nuclear program. Why dont we go and attack them. Those people are crazy and we know what they are gonna do with the bomb, "oh but they are our friends, and we need to use deplomacy" I guess deplomacy is only used when we are in the mood huh?

Answer 8

We've violated UN resolutions

We've used WMD's

We've sponsored terrorists to attack a country (Bay of pigs)

We've shot at planes

As bad as hitler? ARE YOU ******* KIDDING?! Don't you dare compare those. Yeah Saddam was horrible... But he attempted to invade one minor country.

The point isn't that saddam is bad. I know he is. I'm a liberal and although I hate being at war.. I do obviously know that a bad leaders is out of power. DUH

What I don't understand is why you people can't understand that Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11... Admit that... admit it.

Answer 9

It appears to me that you need to be educated on Iraq and Saddam... the 911 Commission Report, after a ful examination of national security facts that we don't even have full access to, determined there was no link between Saddam and Al Qaeda.

Sorry but I really believe them over some guy on YAHOO Answers who 'thinks' he knows stuff.

I bet you don't even know why Saddam gased the Kurds... do you? Did you know that Iraq was at war with Iran at the time and the Kurds has been secretly helping Iran.. that is treason that is punishable by death even in this country. We have American citizens in G.Bay prison right now for helping our enemies.

Answer 10

And if that were the reason he gave us, which it was not, I would possibly be more understanding. Possibly.

But trying to tie it in to 9/11 and use such a tragedy as an excuse to rouse hate for a nation he had long planned on invading anyway? For shame.

And yet it's always the liberals who don't understand the gravity of 9/11. We're the ones who hate the country, because we're not out to demonize the Middle East.


How sad.