and 9/11 happened under Bu$h's watch because he ignoed the FBI reports/memo about the imminent attacks
2006-09-11 16:29:49 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
there wouldn't have BEEN a 9/11 incident without Bush . . .
I think the world noticed...
250,000 innocent ppl dead, and probably more than that many wounded...& the hate keeps building...
and it's not over & won't be over till all the armies converge...then they'll burn themselves out...
then the Millenium of Peace & the Prince of Peace !..
2006-09-11 16:53:00 · answer #1 · answered by bjoybeads 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
oh yes, you are correct: 9/11 happened because of Bush. He was in office 8 months. Clinton was 8 YEARS prior to that. During the time the terrorists did the planning.
OH - but you think the terrorists only got the idea and started planning, AFTER Bush's inaguration?
Ask a real question, next time.
2006-09-11 23:51:13 · answer #2 · answered by Older and Wiser 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Clinton also ignored many terrorist attacks that happened on his watch. Did you forget the first WTC bombing or the embassies or the Cole or the Marine barracks. All of these happened on Clinton's watch. But he had Bin Laden and wouldn't bring him in or kill him whichever were to come first. No, he thought he could just wait. See what waiting got us. Clinton was good for only one thing and he probably wasn't very good at that.
2006-09-11 23:45:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Vroom Vroom. When the 5 lights illuminate, the race shall start. And Bush uses "Iraqi OIL" early into the race. And Clinton just cant seem to catch up.
And the winner, by a mile, GWB. Yeah. All hail mighty Dubya. All hail smart Dubya. LOL
2006-09-12 00:16:11 · answer #4 · answered by Cristiano R 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sorry Dude,... regardless of what others will ever say about Bush, I voted for him and I will support my leader. I had to support every leader that I didn't vote for. That's what America is about. Freedom. And regardless if you agree with what Bush has or has not done while in office he is fighting for Freedom!!
Even the freedom to get your dic* sucked in the oval office, and if Clinton hadn't been spending all of his free time getting jiz on dresses he may have noticed what was happening in the country before Bush got in.
2006-09-11 23:39:29 · answer #5 · answered by junebug 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Obviously lying about the war is worse. Clinton was not a bad president, just a bad husband. Why can't conservatives understand. Of course they do get brainwashed by FOX news.
2006-09-11 23:40:12 · answer #6 · answered by Lambchop08 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nice comparison of two Presidents who served two terms each. Oh wait, it's another one of your half-assed poorly thought rants.
2006-09-11 23:41:19 · answer #7 · answered by slyry75 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Did Clinton?
I never knew that.
I thought that Monica played his skin flute.
2006-09-11 23:35:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
This is lame. You can hardly compare the two, little one. Grow up!
2006-09-11 23:33:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
You two have said it all.
2006-09-11 23:36:39 · answer #10 · answered by howdigethere 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋