We can't find him becuase our idiotic president has sent the troops to Iraq to take over the country and dethrone Saddam due to all his "weapons of mass destruction", which we still haven't found any freaking evidence of todate. Doesn't anyone realize that we went to Iraq because War is Big Business and Bush's oil buddies and Halliburton needed some work!
If Osama is to be found he's going to be in Afghanistan, where he has the support network for Al-Queda. Why can't he be found there, because the poeple of Afghanistan see him as an ally against thier enemy, which is the U.S. $25 million is definitely not a large enough sum of money to get anyone in that religious extremist country to flip on Osama, I can guarantee you that. Those are probably the reasons why we haven't found him, because we have focused our attention on getting our young soldiers killed.
DC
P.S. JJ822,
No one is saying that he shouldn't have fought Terrorism after 9/11, I fully agree that the U.S. should have, just as I agree that Spain, England, and Israel should. You have to protect yourself, but your not gonna give me any of that conservative bull$hit about how there are ties between Iraq and Al-Queda now are you? If you do then you are the one truly lieing to yourself.
2006-09-11 16:16:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by DC 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your history lesson isn't extremely precise. Woodrow Wilson replaced into President from 1913 to 1921. international war a million began in July 1914 without direct involvement of the U. S. Wilson signed the Selective provider Act (draft, conscription) in might 1917 American troops weren't deployed into the trenches of Europe till the summer season of 1918 The war led to November 1918 in line with danger a extra appropriate question is: What could have handed off if Obama did no longer enable army Seals to kill Osama Bin laden, understanding that the CIA replaced into conscious of Bin laden's region for 6 months earlier than the raid? hi bill O'Reilly and all different information Media pundits: the place is the "braveness" in that?
2016-11-07 03:41:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can't believe some of the answers I read on here! For all of you that think Bin Laden should just be so easy to find sign of for the military and go over there and just walk up to him and find him. For all you Bush haters I want to know what would you have done on September 11th 2001. Would you have just said oh well and not done anything to protect us. Don't forget they attacked us! Everybody thinks it is just so easy and that Bush has some hidden agenda well come to reality. I am not saying everything has went good, but we have to fight the terrorist and I will never feel sorry for them.
P.S.
DC,
I am not saying that there is a tie between Iraq and Bin Laden. I am not saying that everything that has happened has been the right thing to do either. But have you ever lived under a cruel dictator. Saddam only cared about himself and not his people. That is why he killed thousands for not doing what he said and thinking what he wanted. At least we live in a country where we can have our opinion and our president will not have us killed for having a different opinion than him.
2006-09-11 16:17:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by jjj822 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Ask the same question about why the British couldn't get George Washington,Bin Laden is a hero to many millions of people. They will die for their hero. He is an area of Pakistan that the Pakistani government or the British never had control over.
Bin Laden isn't a fool, he hand couriers them out, to Pakistan where they are up loaded from a Internet cafe. We know this , it is difficult to place a spy in ever cafe , with a population who hates you and loves your enemy
2006-09-11 16:23:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by brinlarrr 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is a smart criminal, changes up his indentity, keeps on the move, and had his guards do his dirty work. plus he has alot followers who will become a 'martyr' for him. he is tall, dark and well..... rich, not exactly casanova. I imagine he will be killed more likely by a mountain lion or wild desert animal, than anyone else.
The video tapes are said to be passed down from messanger to messanger. I just hope the government is saving their money, because one day he will be found dead or alive and hopefully at that point they wont have to choose between paying the person and their own pay check, ha.
2006-09-11 16:28:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by IndigoSapphire 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Saddam was not found in the middle of nowhere. He was ratted on by the folks at whose house he was hiding, in a populated suburban area swarming with US troops. Remember how hard it was to find him in a country the size of California swarming with our troops. We did not find him, he was revealed to us.
Osama is hiding out in remote areas controlled by hard-core Islamists. He takes advantage of the fact that he has widespread Muslim support. Saddam did not.
Al Jazeera says the tapes are simply dropped off by anonymous people. They seem to believe in terrorists' freedom of speech, so they happily air the tapes.
2006-09-11 16:10:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by speakeasy 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
are you kidding ,are you still on that track ,would the Bush Family let anything happen to the son of their biggest benefactor and financier in business
Bins father has paid GW far more than the USA ever will.
US Airforce planes flew all the Osame >Family to safety BEFORE the 9/11
www.infowars
Alex Jones.
2006-09-11 16:11:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
It was hard to find him, so we pretty much gave up. The task force trying to find him at the CIA was even dismantled.
Besides, Sadaam and the Iraqi regime were the REAL masterminds behind every terrorist attack made anywhere in the world. Didn't you know that? Or do you not watch enough Fox News?
2006-09-11 17:29:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by cognitively_dislocated 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bush needs a boogie man to continue to scare the uninformed masses into supporting his illegal and immoral war. As long as Osama is out there, there are terrorists afoot and we are fighting the war on terror. Yes, I know, it doesn't stand up to any sort of logical scrutiny or investigation, but most people are sitting out there believing everything that Rush and his ilk pump into their ears.
2006-09-11 16:15:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by TXChristDem 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think he is hiding right here in the good old USA and if we found him then we wouldn't have a reason for being in iraq other then the main reason OIL. He wouldnt be the first one of them mud dobbers have hid here.
2006-09-11 16:30:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Steve R 1
·
0⤊
0⤋