I would say$ 5-800 if it truly is in great shape.....
2006-09-11 16:03:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by mobileminiatures 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's only worth what someone is willing to pay for it. That bike wasn't worth a hoot in 1981 and I ASSURE you it doesn't run/handle/perform any better 25 years later. When you see them, they're usually in great shape 'cause the owners didn't like riding them! Sorry to be so blunt. I think there are very few bikes that in any fashion are being considered collectible; at least from the '70's and up. MAYBE the first (69'?) Honda 750, 900Z1 Kawasaki, RD350 Yamaha, The six cylinder Honda (CBX??), the first Goldwing?, maybe a few others. Anyone else agree????
2006-09-12 02:23:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by mike d 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
About $400 tops. I had one of those in 1985 and it was a pile of junk. Underpowered, belt driven, loose frame, cheap electronics, weak suspension... the list goes on and on. The bike was built cheap and designed to sell cheap for those folks wanting a cheap ride with good gas mileage. Kawasaki succeeded in its pursuit with the sale of the 440 ltd bikes. If my memory serves me correctly I think my dad paid about $750 for that bike off the showroom floor in 1981. He gave it to me in 1985 when I received my drivers license and I promptly sold it the following year for $200. It was in excellent condition.
2006-09-11 16:08:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I was going to say $500. Then I was going to agree with $400.
But. I just searched ebay for '440 ltd' and found one going past $850.
Hey, I'm surprized.
2006-09-11 19:46:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by his_voidness 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rule of thumb for a good running older bike is $1 per cc.
2006-09-13 08:34:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by dallenmarket 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
because of the age maybe $400.
2006-09-11 16:04:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Robert F 7
·
0⤊
0⤋