how many died in ny, washington and pa?
2006-09-11 14:49:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by camorningsurfer 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
i'm with "Virginia Gentleman" up there regarding the bushy section. yet I usually disagree with the war with the aid of fact: a million). Iraq posed no threat to the U. S. 2). we don't ought to unfold democracy international extensive. chilly-war-era reasoning shouldn't nevertheless be conscious. 3). WMD threat in Iraq replaced into vulnerable in comparison to different countries (North Korea, Pakistan, and so on). Iraq did no longer presently very own WMD and allowed inspectors into the country..they became up no longer something Iraq replaced into rather no longer something yet a distraction. we ought to continuously have concentrated completely on Afghanistan and the truthfully Al Qaeda threat, yet extremely we've been fed lines approximately democracy, terror, and issues that rather had no longer something to do with Iraq. It have been given to the factor the place many people in united statesa. wrongly believed that Al Qaeda replaced into in Iraq, and that we mandatory to a approach or the different "combat the terrorists" in Iraq to maintain them faraway from us right here. And all of that replaced into basically organic farce.
2016-11-07 03:33:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No and I don't believe the Iraq people had anything to do with the world trade center bombing. It was a group of Saudi Arabians from Afganistan. Militants. Had nothing to do with the Iraq people. Or Sadam Hussein.
2006-09-11 14:51:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I support the reason for going there in the beginning. We needed to let the terrorist know that we were not just going to stand by while they killed innocent people. I now support the troops. They need to know that they have our support. I pray for the men and women who are there defending our freedom. But the instances were horror is aflicted on other innocent people, I do not believe would be okay to any American.
2006-09-11 14:57:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by pappertgal 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
NO invasion of Iraq was wrong in the first place and it has done more damage to iraqi civilians, country is ruined, hundreds of thousands of civilians lost their lifeand country is deliberatly pushed into ethnic and civil war. It is crime against humanity, all those who initiated this and supported and are still supporting this war are criminals.
2006-09-11 15:03:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by bawanies 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
I believe that we are in Iraq fighting a war and we better win. I believe that any soldier committing a crime such as rape should go to prison after a trial. I believe that most Iraqis are thrilled that Saddam (who's sons raped girls to death every day )is gone as proven by polls.
2006-09-11 14:50:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by MEL T 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Never heard about the 14 year old. Sure a soldier did it and got away with that? I think that you heard it from a muslim.
And who attacked who? they did. Then comes Saddam with his army asking us to attack. Civilians will die on occasion, but 99.9% of the time, it's because of those muslim %^$*&@#$ hiding behind hospitals and in crowded cities!
I am not clear on how far it's going, we may just make another Cuba, but I support the war.
2006-09-11 14:55:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
no its like vietman, many inacent will die, gas price to high because of this war
2006-09-11 14:53:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by panchobarronr 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
NO, it is an unjust, illegal war.
2006-09-11 14:49:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by kemchan2 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
No. When did they attack us?
2006-09-11 14:49:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by Nitz Frugent 6
·
2⤊
0⤋