English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1. Vote for war and then cut and run?
2. Appease the enemy?
3. Convert to Islam?
4. Get all of America to convert to Islam?
5. Get Israel to convert to Islam?
6. Get obl and say, "Ok, we won"
7. Have U.N. troops attack the mean Republicans?
8. Tell the terrorists to stop it or the liberals will stop having the NY TIMES defending them?
9. Tell the terrorists to stop it or the liberals will stop giving out talking points for the terrorists?
10. The liberals would ask the terrorists if they would like a piece of America for peace?

2006-09-11 14:42:11 · 34 answers · asked by Search4truth 4 in Politics & Government Politics

11. Eliminate more of their PATRIOTS like Senator Lieberman from their Party?

2006-09-11 14:47:30 · update #1

34 answers

Ladies and Gentleman, we FINALLY have the 10 points to John Kerry's Plan for America...

...unfortunately for the Senator, the election was over a while ago.

2006-09-11 14:45:53 · answer #1 · answered by Mom of One in Wisconsin 6 · 4 1

ummmm....not even close. I can't speak for all "DEMOCRATIC LIBERALS", but I can tell you what I would like to have seen happen.

1. Attack Afghanistan and topple the Taliban. If we had focused on Afghanistan, we could have had an excellent position in the middle east. From that position, we could have kept a VERY watchful eye on Saddam and had troops in the area if they were needed.

2. Catch Osama Bin Laden.

As for all of your other rambling, it's just childish and weird. I don't know of a single Democrat that has suggested anything like appeasement for the enemy or converting to Islam. If you really believe that this so-called "war on terror" is going the way it should be going, you did not listen to what the president told us after 9-11. He said he would hunt down and punish those responsible for 9-11. Now, we're trying to hold together a country that we destroyed. It makes no sense. Bush contradicts himself by saying that the war on terror is about attacking and punishing those who harbor and support terrorists, while acknowledging that Saddam Hussein did not harbor or support terrorists. Wake up! Your president lied to you!

2006-09-11 14:55:27 · answer #2 · answered by rob 3 · 0 0

Democratic Liberals would probably be asking the country to define "a terrorist attack", then decide it wasn't an attack; but a warning. Then they would move to Canada, or just say they would. Finally, when the next warning hit their democratic headquarters.....they would ask the Republicans to get them out of this mess.
Of course, once every thing was fixed so the American way could go on.....the liberal, being the liberals)that they always have been (not to mention having their asses saved) will got back to bashing the President.
Ahh...the American liberal way of life.

2006-09-11 15:09:03 · answer #3 · answered by seatony 3 · 1 0

2 questions for the asker:

1. Where's Osama? It's 5 years and billions of dollars wasted later, and the mastermind of the worst terrorist attack in US history (which happened under GW's watch by the way) is still at large.

2. Most every country used to admire us if not love us, and now most dislike us. Why did GW waste all of the support we had with his stupid Iraq War before Afghanistan was over?

2006-09-11 14:54:45 · answer #4 · answered by Hash 2 · 0 2

Don't know about Democratic Liberals, but Democratic Conservatives would get the facts straight and in a true conservative fashion, attack the responsible people and not just go striking out and making statements like "Bring'm on, we will fight the whole world."

2006-09-11 14:50:16 · answer #5 · answered by Pey 7 · 2 0

Go into Afghanistan where the ones who did it live.
Not some bordering country who knows nothing about what happened. Sad am Hussein wasn't the one who did it.
He was a dorky little has been. Go after Osa ben laden.
He is the one who master minded the whole thing.
If the Republicans weren't so oil hungry. We would have got him and been out of there by now. You can't change the world but now the Republicans have they all hate us.

2006-09-11 14:47:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Liberals would have attacked and captured Bin Laden and brought him to justice. Remember Bin Laden???? HE is the architect of 9/11, not Saddam who had nothing to do with it.

2006-09-11 14:53:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Tom - we force our ideals on them but of course they don't on us. They are trying to convince Americans to convert to Islam. Everyone is so down on Americans and up on everyone else. Hey if you don't like it - leave. No one is stopping you. You go convert to Islam and be with the people - don't call us when they are about to behead you.

2006-09-11 14:46:06 · answer #8 · answered by totalstressor 4 · 6 0

Afgahnistan - everything to do with 9/11 and Democrats are not complaining

Iraq - nothing to do with 9/11...poorly planned and executed military action...no feasible solution for exit at this time...Majority of nation complaining.

2006-09-11 14:48:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The Democrats would have done the same thing: Sell their souls to the IOC (international oil companies) and prevent Iraq from producing oil, thereby making the Saudi's and the Texans very very rich, which is what the Republicrats did according to the Plan which Saddam didn't want to follow anymore.

2006-09-11 14:46:06 · answer #10 · answered by auntiegrav 6 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers