If you can see the object with your eyes, it's easily 1 millimeter (0.001 meter) in scale, such as a single grain of sand. Cells & viruses, however, are much smaller...0.001 millimeters across at the biggest. 0.001 millimeter = 1 micrometer. Even smaller to atomic structure...atom radius = 3 nanometers. This is .0000003 millimeters. SI notation simply eliminates the need for so many zeros to describe a quantity.
My computer has 540,000,000,000 bytes of storage. Or, 540 gigabytes, if you prefer.
2006-09-11 14:49:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Professor 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because the stuff under a microscope is so small that you'd have to use fractions of millimetres. There are 1000 micrometres in a millimetre.
Basically, it's the same reason you don't calculate your height in kilometres.
2006-09-11 21:50:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by sdc_99 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
A millimeter is one thousand times larger than a micrometer; the kinds of things you observe under a microscope are so small that they must be measured with this unit. Otherwise they would call it a milliscope...
2006-09-11 21:49:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by alethiaxx 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because things under a microscope are smaller, as are micrometers. (Micrometers are smaller than millimeters)
^^ I just made that up. That's my educated guess being in 8th grade and all.
2006-09-11 21:45:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Emily 2
·
0⤊
0⤋