do you think that Ronald Reagen knew Bin Laden?

Question

if Ronald Reagen and Bill Clinton knew about bin Laden wht does everyone blame Bush

Answer 1

Ronald Reagan knew and understood progressivly less and less.
By the time he was president and into his second term I doubt if he clearly understood much, but he could still read convincingly from a script.

Answer 2

The Bush family and the Bin Laden family have Christmas dinner together every year. They have been the best of friends since the 50's or 60's and their involvement in international oil , along with more money than the United States treasury has ...total from the Reagan,Bush,Clinton and Bush presidentials combined. Do you not find it strange that the only two presidents ...in history...to attack a single country repeatedly has been the Bush's ? I don't remember Clinton involving Americans so deeply to get the Arabic oil supply. Do you ? Ronald Reagan was a pretty decent fellow , but he didn't run the country. George Bush called all of the shots then as he does now with his son. The problem is that his son is not the great actor that Reagan brought to the white house.Bush has been responsible for many white house decisions since the Nixon presidency ( he was involved heavily with the CIA then). Before that, his father Prescott ( A Nazi supporter ) had close ties to the White House and the money to make sure that the votes went his way. So why hate the Bush's ? Three generations of political terrorism have been waged against the people of this country. I think the hatred should be forgotten. Both men should be brought up on charges of high treason and hanged at the neck until dead.....or firing squad, which ever is the most humane treatment for animals.Any other questions ?

Answer 3

It was 1987 Lt.Col. Oliver North was testifying at the Iran-Contra hearings during the Reagan Administration.

There was Ollie in front of God and country getting the third degree, but what he said was stunning!

He was being drilled by a senator; "Did you not recently spend close to $60,000 for a home security system?"

Ollie replied, "Yes, I did, Sir."

The senator continued, trying to get a laugh out of the audience, "Isn't that just a little excessive?"

"No, sir," continued Ollie.

"No? And why not?" the senator asked.

"Because the lives of my family and I were threatened, sir."

"Threatened? By whom?" the senator questioned.

"By a terrorist, sir" Ollie answered.

"Terrorist? What terrorist could possibly scare you that much?"

"His name is Osama bin Laden, sir" Ollie replied.

At this point the senator tried to repeat the name, but couldn't pronounce it, which most people back then probably couldn't. A couple of people laughed at the attempt. Then the senator continued. Why are you so afraid of this man?" the senator asked.

"Because, sir, he is the most evil person alive that I know of", Ollie answered.

"And what do you recommend we do about him?" asked the senator.

"Well, sir, if it was up to me, I would recommend that an assassin team be formed to eliminate him and his men from the face of the earth."

The senator disagreed with this approach, and that was all that was shown of the clip.


By the way, that senator was Al Gore!

Also: !
Terrorist pilot Mohammad Atta blew up a bus in Israel in 1986. The Israelis captured, tried and imprisoned him. As part of the Oslo agreement with the Palestinians in 1993, Israel had to agree to release so-called "political prisoners."

However, the Israelis would not release any with blood on their hands. The American President at the time, Bill Clinton, and his Secretary of State, Warren Christopher, "insisted" that all prisoners be released.

Thus Mohammad Atta was freed and eventually thanked the US by flying an airplane into Tower One of the World Trade Center. This was reported by many of the American TV networks at the time that the terrorists were first identified.
It was censored in the US from all later reports.

Answer 4

Ronnie had sex with Bin Laden. You know they were in bed with one another. Why did you leave the Sr. Bush out of the question. He was the one that was best of friends with Bin Laden. Blame Bush for what? 9/11? That was the best thing that ever happened for W's reign. And I wish people like Hardtack would quit repeating the urban myth about Oliver North. Its not true. Just look here.

http://www.snopes.com/rumors/north.asp

Answer 5

Reagan and Nancy probably invited bin Laden to dinner at the Whitehouse. They liked all those facist barbarians like Makkos of Philipinnes, Chiochesque of Romania, Ortega of Niciragua, just like Rumsfeld. As for Bush ...never bite off more than you can chew, he set himself up as the conguering hero not listening to those that said Iraq would become a quagmire, foriegn relations nitemare and a financial failure with unsummontable American deaths and now we can say "I told you so".

Answer 6

He knew Saddam.

If you watch Nat Geographic 'Inside 9/11', they show the main the that tiffed bin Laden was the first gulf war. He wanted to use the same force he used to push Russia out of Afghanistan to protect Saudia Arabia from Saddam. However, the Saudi Royal family felt it better that US defend them. It was an major embarrasment to bin Laden.

Answer 7

Bush can't capture him. And Bush uses Bin Laden as an excuse to go into Iraq.

Answer 8

Wasn't it the bush family that had financial connections with Bin Laden interests?

Answer 9

Read you history. Reagan supplied Bin Laden with money, weapons, and training. Reagan made Bin Laden.

Answer 10

the place have you ever been for the final 10 years ? considering the fact that while can one state bypass into yet another united states of america and in simple terms around up human beings and then transport them to a different united states of america and carry them there without struggling with foot right into a court docket while became into that area of international regulation while the Iraq conflict first began the human beings have been given counsel that Saddam became into having dinner at a eating place in down city Baghdad so as that they dropped 4 X 2000 pound bombs on it, is that no longer against the Geneva convention to bomb a community you comprehend would be populated by civilians, can we see all of us being indited for crimes against humanity is all of us charged with conflict crimes ? Saddam is a Prisoner of conflict held by the human beings, to kill or enable a prisoner to be killed or at hand them over to any team or state that would desire to kill them is against the Geneva convention however the human beings did it and no person protests or condemns them for it, it is how the hot worldwide is people who've might are surprising in even though they do