add details
2006-09-11 13:45:37 · 17 answers · asked by queenisha s 1 in Health ➔ General Health Care ➔ Injuries
yes
2006-09-12 09:07:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
*sigh* Who cares? If a person is going to wear a helmet, they are going to wear a helmet whether it is the law or not, and the same vice versa. People still don't buckle up, even if its the law. People do a lot that is outside of the "law". It doesnt matter, because of the whole "free will clause" that is embedded in our brains. And so, who cares? If someone wants to get their head smashed like an egg on the concrete, evolution has tweaked the idiot gene a lil too much and hopefully will correct itself, once all of idiots of that calibur are dead.
2006-09-15 06:59:27 · answer #2 · answered by Flamingpoptart 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Considering the amount of people who have no medical insurance coupled with the kinds of injuries you can receive from not wearing a helmet, the taxpayers are going to be picking up the bill for some large medical expenses.
You know what hospital workers call bikers/bicyclists who don't wear helmets? Organ donors. I kid you not.
2006-09-11 13:53:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If there are 2 or more desirable lanes going interior an analogous route, then convinced, gradual shifting site visitors is had to tug over into the right maximum through site visitors lane lane. in the different case, no. you're not from now on required to tug right into a turning lane or off the line floor.
2016-11-26 02:09:56 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
On one hand I want to say yes because of the potential of having a brain injury should a person get hit by a car or something similar. On the other hand I want to say no because we have the government involved in our lives enough as it is.
2006-09-11 13:47:46 · answer #5 · answered by shirley e 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no because studies show that a helmet can break your neck when you have a ancient. Also studs have proved that when most people fall of a bike they put out there hands and knees to prevent harm
2006-09-11 13:48:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
to save a life, yes... who wants to be brain dead or have lots of debt due to an injury that could've been prevented... well, then of course there's the little kids riding on an empty street but hey... accidents do happen...
2006-09-11 13:47:07 · answer #7 · answered by misery 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in some parts of the developed world bicycle helmets are compulsory (AUSTRALIA)
yes it has prevented many injuries..
2006-09-11 13:53:50 · answer #8 · answered by ssmirk 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. They shouldn't require people to buckle in. If a person wants to die or doesn't care or is stupid enough, then by all means...
2006-09-11 13:53:54 · answer #9 · answered by BeautifulDevil 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
um yea, same condition with the seat belt it is for your protection why wouldnt you want to wear one even if it wasnt required by law?
2006-09-11 13:51:30 · answer #10 · answered by Leah 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not for you. Since you can't spell,maybe a good crack on the head will knock some sense into you...
2006-09-12 00:15:52 · answer #11 · answered by P-nuts and Hair-dos 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋