English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

400 families from that day charged the Bush Admin for obstructing the investigation, having prior knowledge and for "planning" the attacks.. this is not conspiracy banter.. funny how the major media doesn't define this as "news"..

http://www.nancho.net/911/mariani.html
http://www.meria.net/subscribers/interviews/stanley_hilton_9-11_lawsuit.html
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2003-07-13-911-families-cover-usat_x.htm
http://www.rense.com/general57/aale.htm
http://www.senate.gov/~schumer/SchumerWebsite/pressroom/press_releases/PR01276.html
http://www.oilempire.us/hilton.html
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/05/21/1450247
http://truthseeker.wordpress.com/2006/02/07/government-insider-says-bush-authorised-911-attacks/

want more ?

2006-09-11 13:42:18 · 22 answers · asked by hardartsystems 3 in Politics & Government Politics

NO NO... Read the links you doubters.. those people declined the money they were offered.. read, READ !!!!!

2006-09-11 13:49:53 · update #1

to P l Grey at the bottom.. it has been thrown out of court because of the obvious implications.. as for me not having facts ??? what facts did I leave out ?
the reality is .. that these families felt that their president lied to them and they made the ultimate sacrifice as a result... don't lash out at me.. I am just linking what i've found..

2006-09-11 13:53:52 · update #2

p_l_gray .. is that better ? funny how you called me a liberal, but if I look at everyone of your last few questions they begin with "Hey liberal" "this one's for the liberals".. etc.. what's laughable is your inability to embrace the truth, that you are misguided buy your own ego/intolerance and gullibility and are thus bound to jump in step with whom ever you identify. And guess what ? who cares.. I was posting something that I find interesting and based on the answers I am not the only one..

2006-09-11 14:13:08 · update #3

Pi.. you use the word liberal like the nazi's used the word Jew, and racists use the word ***&er.. your intolerance is what defines you with your intolerant reactionary clansmen and women. There was nothing to refute.. you made no point that I can see.. what that I linked without researching ? really ? and you are an expert I suppose..? no you lashed out and I reacted which is wrong on my part.. what you say and what I say matters not.. in fact this whole site is just a big pi$$ing post .. but does show one thing, there are rabid fascists in this country that are willing to throw over everything good that we are to be in the winners box.. you have no consideration, you and your kind for right and wrong.. and you wear the tragedy of this day like you wrap yourself in flag that you have no right to hide behind. So you the reactionary dislike me the peace loving liberal.. that's alright because in my heart I stand for good and you stand for death and hatred, refute that fascist man...

2006-09-11 14:39:52 · update #4

22 answers

because they got the towers blew up, they knew terrorists were going to attack already but wanted the excuse for foreign invasions so they helped by turning a blind eye and planting bombs underneath in the towers foundations to seal support. towers dont fall when they are hit, look at a demolition site! they go downwards with some nice tnt. anyways i couldnt care less, i like moon pie i heard they are bringing out a new flavour is that true?

2006-09-11 13:48:35 · answer #1 · answered by Sweet&Sour 2 · 2 0

Interesting how none of your references are more recent than early 2004.

What ever has happened to all of these lawsuits????

Could they have been dismissed as without merit????


Typical liberal, withhold facts to try and make a point.



Added: You left out the fact that these cases have been tossed as being without merit.

and you spelled my name wrong.


CONSPIRACY!!!! Conspiracy I say, it was all Bush, Cheney and the bogeyman conspiring with Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and Osama Ben Saddam.......


Conspiracy!!!!



You're just linking to what you've found??? Admittedly without researching it??? You sound like a liberal.... I read it on the internet.... Al Gore created the internet.... therefore.... it must be true.



HAHAHAHA You're laughable.


Added: I'm sorry, your last post didn't refute anything that I said. You didn't make a point. And yes... I believe, based on what you find interesting, that you are a liberal. Is there something wrong with that?

As for not embracing the truth.... hmmmm. If you say so. I'm not the one with holding information while trying to make a point.....

the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.... must not be among your favorite phrases.

Interesting also, how other than calling you laughable, which is simply my opinion, I have stayed with the facts. Why must you make this a personal attack? Is it because you have nothing better.....

I wonder......


Added: So now I'm a Nazi and a racist....

more insults. Let me know when you're ready to make a valid argument.

2006-09-11 13:48:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Lets get off the Bash Bush and Chaney web sites and silly blogs and look at the REALITY here -

400 families did not sue Bush and Chaney nor did they charge or accuse them of obstruction.

It was a group of greedy, immoral and oportunist litigation lawyers who caught the smell of deep pockets - possibly the same mind set that sues McDonalds when an idiot puts a paper cup full of hot coffee in her lap and drives away with it - or when a drunken fool injures or kills someone in a car wreck and then sues the bartender and drinking establishment for serving them the alcohol.

Want more?

2006-09-11 13:55:18 · answer #3 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0 0

Apparently they want to become billionaires by suing the airlines and everyone else. The news media is apparently covering this story or where would you get your USA Today type links?

They were declined the money they were offered to not sue the airlines. Then they sued the airlines. I did read the ones that aren't from conspiracy only websited, did you? It also mentions prominant lawyers that won billion dollar settlements from the tobacco industry.

2006-09-11 13:50:43 · answer #4 · answered by MEL T 7 · 0 0

We do feel sorry for these mislead people who have accepted too many of the lies and other bull on the internet.

Yes people can file law suits but they are a joke since they have no basis and the court should have never accepted them.

And no it is not news because no serious person believes that the US or Bush had anything to do with the attack.

In the old days a few nuts would have wrote an article in some newspaper tabiold today they get to write a blog and get other nuts to follow them.

And yes this is merly conspiracy foolishness.

I feel sorry for these mislead or mentally irresponsible people who have accepted any of this sillyness as truth.

2006-09-11 13:49:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Funny how this isn't really a question.

Why? Because those families have lost someone close to them, and since they can't sue the terrorists, they want someone to pay.

If you want to talk about media humor, try looking into our national security. The media publishes which airports are lacking in their security, yet this is apparently worthy news.

2006-09-11 13:48:03 · answer #6 · answered by FaZizzle 7 · 0 1

President bush Senior was a good friend of binlondan until he started training others what we did in our army. Bush Senior could of but on trial a long time since he know about but did not want to because he thought he would lose his seat in office

2006-09-11 13:45:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

They woulda sued and Pres or VP who was in office. Money is more powerful to some people than the death of their own family members. Why do you think families fight over wills. Money Money Money

2006-09-11 13:45:41 · answer #8 · answered by korines 3 · 2 0

well i dont want to read all that so im just gonna tell you what i think i think thay sued them becuase they said that they knew about the attack but they didnt do anything and ba ba ba so thas why i mean thas what i think

2006-09-11 13:45:49 · answer #9 · answered by angel 3 · 1 0

george bush and dick had it within their control to prevent the attacks and they sat back and let it happen. they deserve more than a law suit

2006-09-11 13:48:28 · answer #10 · answered by Eric B 4 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers