If the Democrats try to do this, one can only imagine what the current administration is working on...
http://tidewateralive.com/buzz/nfblog/?p=189
The Path to 9/11 Could Kill ABC License to Broadcast
Posted Friday, Sep 8th, 2006
Washington, DC — The Senate Democratic Leadership has sent the following letter to Disney President and CEO Robert Iger, urging him to cancel the grossly inaccurate upcoming miniseries The Path to 9/11... (see website)
-----------------------
Miniseries suggests fiction, so why the uproar?
While I agree the use of this miniseries to educate our youth is a concern, perhaps it is being used to inspire discussion and research, not claim certain events are factual.
The obligation of the media boils own to public interest. Unfortunately, I think private interest intervenes more often than not, leaving us to wonder what is fact and what is fiction.
1) Do all governments control media?
2) If not, what examples can we learn from?
2006-09-11
13:34:47
·
6 answers
·
asked by
stoptheinsanity_73
3
in
News & Events
➔ Media & Journalism
Hey did you notice?
I have 911 Yahoo Points and it's 9/11/2006. Wow, I feel special.
2006-09-11
14:30:35 ·
update #1
So what is the deal with TV/Radio Stations and Cable channels?
I can understand why Radio stations can be a limited resource based on the spectrum of radio waves available, therefore the concept of public sharing policies.
TV Stations? Only so many local stations? Again, public sharing concept.
Cable channels? Is there really a limit? Now it seems more based on profit margins (more viewers, more profits from advertising sources, etc.)
With this in mind, TV and Radio are more socialistic in nature, while Cable is capitalistic? And if so, why do we not see more private channels popping up that offer their view on the world???
It seems cable or satellite channels offer the most opportunity to get away from the claws of government that attempt to control what is reported. Yes?
Yet CNN is one of those that seem less objective?
2006-09-13
13:20:02 ·
update #2