English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

was on the name of Al-Qaeda when the Government really DID it to get economic benefits and affections from the town and immunity to attack Afganistan or Irak? There is a complicated question, but I was a survivor of an "islamic" attack and I have watched the documentary "9-11 Loose Change" in google and I am very confused

2006-09-11 11:12:42 · 18 answers · asked by destreza65 1 in Politics & Government Government

18 answers

Don't fall for too much BS. You can find sources on the internet that will tell you 9/11 was the result of an alien psyche test.

2006-09-11 11:15:44 · answer #1 · answered by Emporer_Smiley 2 · 2 1

It is very much possible and true that all the Governments
in the world lie about threat of terrorist attack for the following
reasons.

1. To hide facts about their inability to
trace the culprits.

2. To project, as if they are the best
care takers of their people & business.

3. To divert the attention of the masses.

4. To project and seek support of the
masses to get votes.

5. Showing the world that they are
prepared to defend and attack others
with their weapon prowess.

6. Make a platform to sell arms to
all other countries( Missile shield,
guided missiles, nuclear weapons,
Fighter air crafts like stealths, Warships,
Submarine launchers etc.)

7. Arrange pre-emptive strikes on
foreign soil like Iraq etc.

2006-09-11 13:14:49 · answer #2 · answered by pianist 5 · 0 0

Sorry to hear that you were attacked. I lost a co worker on 9/11, who left a pregnant wife behind. I don't want to believe the government could be so heinus as to be behind an attack like 9/11. But our government toyed with the idea in 1962, so who knows. If in fact that it was true, I don't think the American public could handle it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

2006-09-11 11:17:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hear me very carefully, the people who flew those planes into those towers, were the most vicious, and cowardly beings on the face of the planet.
Those types need to be weeded out and annihilated with prejudice.
Do not torture, do not terrorize, kill.
How dare they attack innocent Americans on American soil.
I am already an American veteran of two foriegn wars, and I wish I was young enough, I would love to help weed them out.
I am not a bad guy, I will not hurt civillians, but believe me when I say my trigger finger still works.
I can be a combatants worse nightmare.
Our government is being attacked just like the rest of us.

2006-09-11 11:26:59 · answer #4 · answered by theodore r 3 · 1 1

I saw a picture in the paper today that shows the pentagon after it was supposedly hit by an aircraft if you look at the building there is no evidence of any aircraft near the pentagon itself and if you notice that the section that was destroyed is withing a section of the building which means that the destruction was within one subsection of the building. The pentagon I believe was made in sections or aka slices. Only a demolition explosion can be this accurate in taking out a sub-section.

2006-09-11 11:28:46 · answer #5 · answered by Mark B 2 · 0 1

shame on you! Do you particularly think of our government could orchestrate certainly one of those charade, killing all those people (babies too) purely for financial benefit? Our government isn't suited and confident they do lie, however the yank government did no longer kill 3,000+ people just to point the finger at somebody else. we're not like those filthy barbarians in Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and so on, who kill indiscriminately every person who opposes their f ucked up faith. in case you think of Al-Qaeda is harmless, and Bin laden is unquestionably one of those great guy, in line with danger you should circulate stay in that f.ucking s.hit hollow desolate tract cave with something of the filthy rag heads and consume dates and Camel dung, you fool. If the loopy a ss Islamic extremists did no longer have something to do with 9/11, why have been they dancing and cheering interior the streets with the aid of fact the towers fell. in line with danger you should think of and do somewhat learn till now asking such an IGNORANT question. and extra extra, "loose replace" replaced right into a one-sided, twisted, ****'d up docudrama comprehensive of holes and conspiracy theories. it rather is approximately as credible and lifelike as an episode of sponge bob, purely the sponge has an greater IQ than Michael Moore.

2016-11-07 03:14:21 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

First one must understand that terrorist to one country ma be freedom fighter to another. But I do understand what you are saying. Thes "terrorist attacks" could be an event made as a series of lies. but then again. Theres three parts to every story, yours
mine
and the truth and none of them are lies.

2006-09-11 11:30:16 · answer #7 · answered by Eris Discordia 2 · 0 0

Congratulation on posing a very difficult question. I honestly don't know. There are so many conspiracy theories flying about, who knows the truth? Perhaps, it was a means to an end to invade Afghanistan and Iraq? I am sorry you are confused and now you have confused me too. Gut feel tells me it wasn't stage managed.

2006-09-12 05:16:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I wouldn't hold too close to the video's which are usually made to pull you one way or the other. If the government had done this I don't think they would have attacked the Pentagon.

2006-09-11 11:17:03 · answer #9 · answered by TheMightyOne 3 · 0 0

No, especially if many lives are involved.

2006-09-11 20:33:16 · answer #10 · answered by ssrajman 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers