English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

was on the name of Al-Qaeda when the Government really DID it to get economic benefits and affections from the town and immunity to attack Afganistan or Irak? There is a complicated question, but I was a survivor of an "islamic" attack and I have watched the documentary "9-11 Loose Change" in google and I am very confused

2006-09-11 11:07:56 · 18 answers · asked by serena b 1 in Politics & Government Government

18 answers

http://www.lolloosechange.co.nr/

Loose change is fiction buddy. Welcome to reality.

2006-09-11 11:08:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No it's not possible. There would be too many loose leaks to give it away. The people who say such things have not been anywhere near the attack or had been touched by it. Some of them have actually learned subterfuge in countries such as Cuba to create dissent in America. Remember the phrase 'divide and conquer'? It's much easier to get to America by dividing it first. That's exactly what Al-Qaeda is trying to do in Iraq right now by creating dissent against the new democratic gov't and each other. If it (democracy) fails then they might as well let the terrorists take over (Al-Qaeda's philosophy) because things were much better when they had a brutal leader.
Please really research any conspiracy theory before believing it. For instance Mr. Moore's movie Farenhiet 911. A good 90% was debunked before it even came out.

2006-09-11 11:20:02 · answer #2 · answered by madbaldscotsman 6 · 0 0

Documented evidence suggests:

1. Al Qaeda planned, funded and executed the 9/11 and 7/7 attacks
2. Al Qaeda is compromised solely of radical, literal interpretationists of the Quran who call themselves defenders of Islam but have brought nothing but wrath upon all Muslims.
3. The economic benefits of war are??? Stagnant stock and bond markets, higher energy prices, mass exit of middle-class jobs, influx of low/no-skilled workers sinking the wages of legal American wage-earners....what economic benefit? what affection? WHAT are you TALKING ABOUT?
4. If there was immunity to attack Afghanistan and Iraq, I don't see it. We oust the Taliban and Saddam and the world sees that as a bad trend towards imperialism. It just goes to show the ignorance and maleducation of the rest of the world. Or perhaps their satisfaction or ambivalence with respect to evil and death.
5. What Islamic attack did you survive? Who do you believe is truly responsible? What, if anything, coming out of Google is productive to humanity in the very least? WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?

The facts exist, and they are:

a) radical Islam is responsible for most of the world's terrorism
b) this terrorism is funded by radical Muslims who refuse to risk their own lives, but have no problem spending about 1% of their wealth killing non-Muslims through suicidal/homicidal proxies
c) these radical Muslims derive their wealth either directly or indirectly through the tax and energy dollars spent by Western democracies (so there is the government complicity you seek)
d) If we are given a choice of riding donkeys to work and starving the Middle East of petro-dollars OR bringing the Middle East into the 20th (then 21st Century eventually) and stabilizing the energy resources we rely on....NO ONE will opt for the donkey!

So, enough b/s about how Americans planned these sick and twisted acts against their own. That is a very disturbed view of the world, not everything is a conspiracy for concentration of power. Sometimes the world's dementia makes itself abundantly evident, and 9/11 was one of those days. Thankfully the 1800 or so days since have seen the dementia addressed in a decisive and forceful way. When cultural dialogue is abandoned for senseless violence, then the violence must be aborted, forcefully, and in that case, Ms. Merkel (PM of Germany), the ENDS do justify the MEANS.

2006-09-11 11:20:39 · answer #3 · answered by rohannesian 4 · 0 0

Since Nixon and Watergate, I have no problem believing that the government is capable or willing to lie to the public. However, its harder to believe that our government would make such a complex conspiracy such as 9/11, involving the deaths of thousands of our own people for some personal gain. I just don't believe that we live in that kind of society. And it seems retarded to blame the president for this incident or to blame him for all the problems we have in this country. He just doesnt have that much power. Call me naive, but just because something is possible, and many people say its true, doesnt mean it is true or even probable. Remember when the majority of society believed the world was flat? People were called idiotic or even persecuted and killed for not believing that. But, obviously they weren't the naive ones. Of course, I am one that believes that OJ didnt kill Nicole with his bare hands. I think only an idiot would commit such a crime while being such a high profile celebrity. But, I could be wrong.

2006-09-11 11:18:09 · answer #4 · answered by Rob 3 · 0 0

No. The government isn't going to ram two planes into the twin towers which would probably WORSEN our economy rather than help it. As well as ram a plane into the pentagon, which could have destroyed valuable CIA information? Also, the plane industry was down for a week, and malls were closed. The economy basically stopped for a few days, and this wouldn't really be an economic plus. Now would it?

2006-09-11 11:10:37 · answer #5 · answered by rykster22 1 · 1 0

I believe that Osama and his terrorists are responsible for 9-11, despite all the conspiracy theories,, however,, bin Laden continues to train the Taliban terrorists on the Pakistan, Afghanistan border,, Bush stopped the CIA team in 2003,,who were on the hunt for the worlds #1 terrorist, that he promised the American people would be brought to justice, dead or alive,, he is still training terrorists, and putting in his 2 cents about the war in Iraq,,,,,,,,,,

2006-09-11 11:18:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Just for you information, "Loose Change" is a horribly twisted video. They twist facts, and they use half-truths. I personally don't believe 9/11 was a government conspiracy, but I'm all for conspiracy theories. I just advise you to not trust Loose Change, and to research your stuff from multiple resources before believing it.

2006-09-11 11:12:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Loose change is all about destroying Americans faith in America. It is lies and propaganda. Any intelligent person can look at the scenes (not the ones edited in a fictional movie) and see that it was real.

2006-09-11 11:12:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Man, I hate Bush, but Al-Queda did 9/11.

2006-09-11 11:13:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Anything is possible in the United States. I find it hard to believe that they didn't know something maybe not to extent that it went. But they were aware of something because right after it happen they didn't have a problem going right to the hotel that they were staying in.

2006-09-11 11:10:51 · answer #10 · answered by kitcat 6 · 0 1

I've heard people say that documentary is very confusing. Very well done but misleading. let's hope it's not true. If it was, we're living through a very bad time.

2006-09-11 11:10:42 · answer #11 · answered by Mandy A 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers