Thomas is better
2006-09-11 10:39:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by ??Dani??? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's hard to compared them, they both played in different era but i strongly believe Isiah Thomas has the edge over Nate Archibald.
2006-09-11 15:31:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by JUNIORapprentice 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nate was a superior scorer and passer - he led the league is pts and assists one year, and came close several other times - but Isiah was clutch. Not saying Nate wouldn't deliver, but Isiah DELIVERED. When it mattered most, I'd say Isiah was better.
2006-09-11 13:50:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by mooseymoose 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with you. Isiah Thomas is better.
2006-09-11 10:39:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow. What an off the wall question. I like it. I haven't heard anyone talk about Nate in years.
I'm gonna' pick Nate just 'cause I know no one who answers will. He led the league in scoring & assists at least once. It was a WAY different game back then, but he was barely 6' tall and dominated.
2006-09-11 10:59:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by cantthinkofanygoodnames 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're asking about players from different eras. It's like asking who's better, Ty Cobb or Ted Williams?
When comparing different players everything should be taken into account. The type of game played during a certain era, the exhausting travel time players have today with coast to coast games, etc.
2006-09-11 18:57:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Doc Watson 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
isiah thomas.
2006-09-11 10:42:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Naima 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Isaiah Thomas...
2006-09-11 14:39:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Isiah was better
2006-09-11 10:58:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Red Sawx ® 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have only heard of thomas. So I have to say he's better
2006-09-11 10:41:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by uclmr@sbcglobal.net 3
·
0⤊
0⤋